Back

Comparisons of iron phenotypes and reports of menses, pregnancies, and live births in women with HFE p.C282Y homozygosity and HFE wt/wt

Barton, J. C.; Barton, J. C.; Acton, R. T.

2026-01-06 hematology
10.64898/2026.01.02.25338237 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThere is no comparison of iron phenotypes and menses, pregnancies, and live births reports of women with HFE-related hemochromatosis (HFE p.C282Y (rs1800562) homozygosity) and HFE wt/wt (absence of p.C282Y and HFE p.H63D (rs1799945)). Subjects and MethodsWe compared phenotypes and reports of non-Hispanic white women women aged [≥]25 y in post-population screening evaluations using univariable methods. ResultsThere were 153 p.C282Y/p.C282Y and 273 wt/wt. Median ages were 50 y (25, 86) and 55 y (25, 92), respectively (p=0.0019). Median transferrin saturation (TS), median serum ferritin (SF), and provisional iron overload prevalence were higher in p.C282Y/p.C282Y (p [≤]0.0001, each comparison). Prevalences of documented iron overload (3.3% p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 0.7% wt/wt), iron overload-related disease (2.0% vs. 0.4%, respectively), and iron deficiency (3.9% vs. 2.6%, respectively) were not significantly different. Median ages at menarche (13 y p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 13 y wt/wt) and menopause (50 y vs. 49 y, respectively) were not significantly different. Reports of "in-between bleeding?" (24.2% p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 25.2% wt/wt, respectively), "early stopping of periods?" (11.8% vs. 13.9%, respectively), and "had a hysterectomy?" (30.1% vs. 35.9%, respectively) were not significantly different. Respective percentage pairs of women with p.C282Y/p.C282Y and wt/wt who reported 0, 1, 2, 3, or [≥]4 pregnancies (or live births) did not differ significantly. Live births/pregnancies were 287/363 (79.1%, p.C282Y/p.C282Y) and 534/673 (79.3%, wt/wt) (p=0.7549). ConclusionsMedian TS, median SF, and provisional iron overload prevalence are greater in women with HFE p.C282Y/p.C282Y than those with wt/wt, although reports of menses, pregnancies, and live births are similar.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.3%
2
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%