Back

Comparisons of iron phenotypes and reports of menses, pregnancies, and live births in women with HFE p.C282Y homozygosity and HFE wt/wt

Barton, J. C.; Barton, J. C.; Acton, R. T.

2026-01-06 hematology
10.64898/2026.01.02.25338237 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThere is no comparison of iron phenotypes and menses, pregnancies, and live births reports of women with HFE-related hemochromatosis (HFE p.C282Y (rs1800562) homozygosity) and HFE wt/wt (absence of p.C282Y and HFE p.H63D (rs1799945)). Subjects and MethodsWe compared phenotypes and reports of non-Hispanic white women women aged [≥]25 y in post-population screening evaluations using univariable methods. ResultsThere were 153 p.C282Y/p.C282Y and 273 wt/wt. Median ages were 50 y (25, 86) and 55 y (25, 92), respectively (p=0.0019). Median transferrin saturation (TS), median serum ferritin (SF), and provisional iron overload prevalence were higher in p.C282Y/p.C282Y (p [≤]0.0001, each comparison). Prevalences of documented iron overload (3.3% p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 0.7% wt/wt), iron overload-related disease (2.0% vs. 0.4%, respectively), and iron deficiency (3.9% vs. 2.6%, respectively) were not significantly different. Median ages at menarche (13 y p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 13 y wt/wt) and menopause (50 y vs. 49 y, respectively) were not significantly different. Reports of "in-between bleeding?" (24.2% p.C282Y/p.C282Y vs. 25.2% wt/wt, respectively), "early stopping of periods?" (11.8% vs. 13.9%, respectively), and "had a hysterectomy?" (30.1% vs. 35.9%, respectively) were not significantly different. Respective percentage pairs of women with p.C282Y/p.C282Y and wt/wt who reported 0, 1, 2, 3, or [≥]4 pregnancies (or live births) did not differ significantly. Live births/pregnancies were 287/363 (79.1%, p.C282Y/p.C282Y) and 534/673 (79.3%, wt/wt) (p=0.7549). ConclusionsMedian TS, median SF, and provisional iron overload prevalence are greater in women with HFE p.C282Y/p.C282Y than those with wt/wt, although reports of menses, pregnancies, and live births are similar.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.