Back

Detection of Novel Acoustic Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease through a Machine Learning-Based Composite Spectrogram Analysis

Tsutsumi, K.; Chang, P. D.; Isfahani, S. A.

2026-01-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.01.25343300 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSpeech abnormalities are common in Parkinsons disease (PD). Machine learning (ML) offers potential for objective and scalable speech-based diagnostics. This study introduces an explainable ML pipeline that leverages a novel vowel articulation-based composite input to detect PD and identify phoneme-level biomarkers. MethodsTwo publicly available datasets of PD speech recordings were analyzed. Sustained vowel articulations were converted into log-mel spectrograms either individually or as a composite image by vertically concatenating a set of vowels per subject. Processed spectrograms were used to train ML models, with performance assessed using five-fold cross-validation and bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was applied to quantify model attention across vowel regions. ResultsA total of 150 patients (49.3% PD) were included. Acoustic analysis revealed significant group differences in cepstral peak prominence and harmonics-to-noise ratio, particularly for vowel /u/ (p < 0.05). The ML model achieved an average AUROC of 0.805 using individual vowels and improved to 0.928 with the composite input (p < 0.001). Grad-CAM demonstrated the highest activation for vowel /u/ (p < 0.001), consistent with acoustic findings. ConclusionThe proposed explainable composite spectrogram approach dually enabled high classification performance and identification of a vowel biomarker. Concordance between ML and acoustic analyses highlights the translational potential of explainable ML in PD speech assessment and its ability to reveal underlying pathophysiological insights.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.