Modeling echolocation as an active pursuit of information via infotaxis
Lee, W.-J.; Buck, J. R.; Tyack, P.
Show abstract
Echolocation is a closed-loop active sensing modality in which animals not only choose how they move to acquire information, but also actively modulate incoming sensory (echo) information by shaping the acoustic signals they emit to probe the environment. While many models describe how echolocating animals react to prior echoes by adjusting subsequent behavior, few explicitly model how they cognitively reason about information embedded in echoes when determining future actions. Here, we extend "infotaxis," an information-greedy algorithm originally developed for olfactory search, to sonar sensing by formulating an echolocating agent searching for a single target under sensory uncertainty characterized by probabilities of miss and false alarm. Through analytical and computational analyses, we show that the characteristic exploration-exploitation balance of infotaxis is conserved across sensory modalities, and that the efficiency and reliability of infotaxis search depend strongly on sensory information quality. Compared with a maximum a posteriori agent that always directs the beam to the most probable target location, the infotaxis agent consistently completes searches with fewer pings and greater robustness to sensory uncertainty. These results highlight information as a powerful concept for understanding active sensing and for revealing principles of sonar-guided autonomy in both biological and engineered systems.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconciling time and prediction error theories of associative learning 95%
- Linear reinforcement learning: Flexible reuse of computation in planning, grid fields, and cognitive control 95%
- Revealing principles of autonomous thermal soaring in windy conditions using vulture-inspired deep reinforcement-learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.