Nuclear SnRK1 activity delays clubroot development in Arabidopsis by reducing sink strength
Vijayakumar, H.; Guillaume, N.; Vandesteene, L.; Van Dijck, P.; Van den Ende, W.; De Coninck, B.; Rolland, F.
Show abstract
Clubroot, caused by the soil-borne protist Plasmodiophora brassicae, is a major disease of Brassica crops, resulting in severe root malformations and yield losses. While most research has centered on immune signaling and hormone dynamics, plant-pathogen interactions also dramatically reshape primary metabolism, often modifying source activity and converting infecting tissues into strong metabolic sinks. The SnRK1 (SNF1-related kinase 1) protein kinase acts as a cellular fuel gauge in plants, integrating metabolic status and environmental and developmental cues to maintain carbon and energy homeostasis. Here, we explored SnRK1-mediated quantitative resistance against clubroot disease in the related crucifer model Arabidopsis thaliana. Both soil and hydroponic-based disease bioassays revealed how especially increased nuclear SnRK11 activity antagonizes clubroot development, suggesting a pivotal role for transcriptional regulation. qRT-PCR analysis and quantification of soluble sugar contents and invertase activity in roots indicate that SnRK1 represses sucrose transporter expression as well as cell wall invertase (CWINV) expression and activity, likely limiting clubroot development by reducing sink strength. Consistently, cellular assays indicate that the recently identified SnRK11-targeting P. brassicae effector PBZF1 interferes with SnRK11 nuclear translocation. Our study thus corroborates that SnRK1 is a primary effector target and shows that SnRK1-mediated reprogramming of gene expression and sink activity is an effective mechanism against clubroot disease development.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estradiol-inducible AvrRps4 expression reveals distinct properties of TIR-NLR-mediated effector-triggered immunity 96%
- Transcription factors SlMYB41, SlMYB92 and SlWRKY71 regulate gene expression in tomato exodermis 96%
- MYB12 spatiotemporally represses TMO5/LHW-mediated transcription in the Arabidopsis root meristem 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic screen to saturate guard cell signaling network reveals a role of GDP-L-fucose metabolism in stomatal closure 96%
- The role of trehalose 6-phosphate in shoot branching - local and non-local effects on axillary bud outgrowth in arabidopsis rosettes 96%
- The Arabidopsis WRR4A and WRR4B paralogous NLR proteins both confer recognition of multiple Albugo candida effectors 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- N-terminally truncated helper NLR NRG1C antagonizes immunity mediated by its full-length neighbors NRG1A and NRG1B 96%
- Medicago SPX1 and SPX3 regulate phosphate homeostasis, mycorrhizal colonization and arbuscule degradation 96%
- The blast effector Pwl2 is a virulence factor that modifies the cellular localisation of host protein HIPP43 to suppress immunity. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of INOSITOL PHOSPHORYLCERAMIDE SYNTHASE 2 (IPCS2) as a new rate-limiting component in Arabidopsis pathogen entry control 96%
- Downy mildew effector HaRxL106 interacts with the transcription factor BIM1 altering plant growth, BR signaling and susceptibility to pathogens 96%
- SnRK1 inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis through both transcriptional regulation and direct phosphorylation and dissociation of the MYB/bHLH/TTG1 MBW complex. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- De novo indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate biosynthesis, and not long-distance transport, contributes to defence of Arabidopsis against powdery mildew 96%
- Overexpression of the receptor-like kinase BIR1 gene causes SOBIR1- and EDS1-dependent cell death phenotypes in Arabidopsis 96%
- TOR coordinates Cytokinin and Gibberellin signals mediating development and defense 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.