Satellite DNA fragility accompanies complex genome rearrangements and ecDNA oncogene amplification in canine osteosarcomas
Yilmaz, F.; Kong, W.; Syed, S. A.; O'Neill, F. H.; Lombardi, J. T.; Ng, P. K. S.; Lau, C. C.; Lee, C.
Show abstract
Canine osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive bone cancer with remarkable similarity to human OS. Despite its value as a comparative oncology model, the drivers of genomic instability remain poorly defined, hindering cross-species insights into disease progression. We applied long-read PacBio HiFi whole genome sequencing to matched tumor and blood samples from four purebred dogs to generate high-resolution maps of somatic structural variants (SVs). Tumor genomes showed extensive rearrangement complexity, with satellite repeat regions, particularly SAT1_CF, enriched near somatic SV breakpoints and occurring within genomic contexts marked by focal hypomethylation. We also identified multiple extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) elements carrying oncogenes indicating ecDNA-mediated oncogene amplification. Together, these data provide an integrated genomic and epigenomic view of canine OS, implicating satellite repeats as recurrent substrates for rearrangement and ecDNA as a prominent mode of genome remodeling. This work advances our understanding of OS genome dynamics and establishes a comparative framework for investigating repeat-driven instability and oncogene amplification across species.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Allele-specific DNA methylation is increased in cancers and its dense mapping in normal plus neoplastic cells increases the yield of disease-associated regulatory SNPs 95%
- SVFX: a machine-learning framework to quantify the pathogenicity of structural variants 94%
- SlideCNA: Spatial copy number alteration detection from Slide-seq-like spatial transcriptomics data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.