Back

Volume Electron Microscopy of Cortical Organoids: Methods for Region Identification, Connectome Reconstruction, and Organelle Segmentation

Dallere, S.; Mattioni, A.; Turegano-Lopez, M.; Blazquez-Llorca, L.; Merchan-Perez, A.; Schellino, R.; Vercelli, A.; DeFelipe, J.; Boido, M.

2025-12-31 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.31.697152 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Volume electron microscopy (vEM) has become a powerful tool for 3D ultrastructural analysis of neural circuits, yet its application to human brain organoids remains limited, particularly for connectomic studies. Here, we established a comprehensive and scalable workflow for applying vEM to human cortical organoids, integrating correlative light and electron microscopy, large-area SEM mosaic imaging, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) validation. By systematically comparing two embedding protocols in use, we demonstrated that the DeFelipe and Fairen (1993)/Cano-Astorga et al. (2024) method provides optimal compatibility with toluidine blue-stained semithin sectioning and enables reliable synapse segmentation and neurite tracing. In contrast, the Deerinck et al. (2010) protocol offers enhanced membrane contrast but limits postsynaptic density visualization. Using FIB-SEM imaging of peripheral, neuropil-like regions of cortical organoids, we achieved accurate 3D reconstruction of synapses, neurites and intracellular organelles, enabling quantitative assessment of synaptic apposition surfaces, neurite trajectories, and organelle distribution across defined cellular compartments. Together, our results demonstrate for the first time the feasibility of micro-connectomic reconstruction in human cortical organoids at nanometer resolution. This methodological framework expands the applicability of vEM to organoid systems and provides a robust foundation for future studies of human brain development, disease modeling, and therapeutic evaluation at the synaptic and subcellular level.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
2
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
8
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
11
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%