Back

Per-allele disease and complex trait effect sizes are predominantly African MAF-dependent in European populations

Rossen, J.; Strober, B. J.; Hou, K.; Kerner, G.; Price, A. L.

2026-01-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2025.12.31.25343290 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding genetic architectures of disease is fundamental to partitioning heritability, polygenic risk prediction, and statistical fine-mapping. Genetic architectures of disease in European populations have been shown to depend on European minor allele frequency (MAF): SNPs with lower MAF have larger per-allele effects, due to the action of negative selection. However, we hypothesized that African MAF (defined using African-ancestry segments in African Americans), which is not distorted by the out-of-Africa bottleneck, might better predict per-allele effect sizes of common genetic variation in European populations; we note that common variants explaining most disease heritability are typically much older than the split between African and non-African populations. To demonstrate this, we first analyze the proportion of non-synonymous SNPs, which are strongly impacted by negative selection. The proportion of non-synonymous SNPs is much better predicted by African MAF than European MAF; a mixture of African MAF with weight w=0.95 (95% CI: (0.93, 0.96)) and European MAF with weight (1-w) is a more powerful predictor than either European MAF (P<10-15, 3.65x greater increase in log-likelihood relative to a null model without MAF dependence) or African MAF (P<10-15). Next, we consider the widely used model, in which per-allele GWAS effect size variance is proportional to [(1 - )], where pE is the European MAF. We propose a different model in which per-allele effect size variance is proportional to [(1 - )], where pmix=w*pA+(1-w)*pE, and pA is the African MAF. We fit the mix model by extending the baseline-LD model used in S-LDSC to include a grid of bivariate African and European MAF bins and identifying values of w and mix that best fit mean effect size variance estimates from S-LDSC across bivariate MAF bins. We demonstrate that our approach provides conservative estimates of w in simulations. We applied this approach to summary statistics for 50 diseases/complex traits in European populations (average N=483K) and estimated best-fit parameters of w=0.96 (95% CI: (0.76, 1.16)) and mix=-0.34 (95% CI: (-0.67, -0.02)), attaining a far better fit than the standard model using pE only (P<10-15, 4.53x greater decrease in mean-squared error relative to a null model without MAF dependence). We conclude that per-allele disease and complex trait effect sizes are predominantly African MAF-dependent in European populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.