Synchrony between brain age maturation and internalising and externalising symptoms across adolescence
Beck, D.; Carrick, C.; Aksnes, E.; MacSweeney, N.; Westlye, L. T.; Fuhrmann, D.; Tamnes, C. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundAdolescence is a period of rapid neurobiological and behavioural change, yet it remains unclear how deviations from normative brain maturation relate to the development of internalising and externalising symptoms. MethodsUsing data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we combined brain age prediction with bivariate latent growth curve (BLGC) models to test whether deviations in brain maturation - indexed by the brain age gap (BAG) - relate to mental health development across late childhood and adolescence. Brain age was estimated using T1-weighted, diffusion (dMRI), resting-state fMRI, and multimodal MRI data across four waves (ages [~]8.3-17.5). Internalising and externalising symptoms were assessed across ten waves with the self-report Brief Problem Monitor (BPM). ResultsAcross T1, dMRI, and multimodal models, deviations from age-expected brain maturation and internalising and externalising symptoms showed coordinated nonlinear development across adolescence. Adolescents whose brains increasingly diverged from age-expected maturation over time also showed increasing symptom trajectories. These associations were small to moderate in magnitude and were most consistent for internalising symptoms in females (r = .15-.23), whereas externalising symptoms showed broader but less selective nonlinear associations across modalities in both males and females (r = .15-.23). Intercept-level associations were weaker and modality-specific (r = .06-.11). Formal tests provided no evidence for robust sex differences in these associations after correction for multiple comparisons. ConclusionThese results indicate that adolescent development of mental health problems is more strongly linked to nonlinear changes in how individuals diverge from age-expected brain trajectories, rather than to fixed differences in brain age. Shifts in brain maturational tempo may therefore be a key feature underlying vulnerability to psychopathology in youth.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Age-related change in task-evoked amygdala-prefrontal circuitry: a multiverse approach with an accelerated longitudinal cohort aged 4-22 years 95%
- Cross-sectional brain age assessments are limited in predicting future brain change 94%
- Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Educational Environment and White Matter Development in Early Adolescence 94%
- A general exposome factor explains individual differences in functional brain network topography and cognition in youth 93%
- Aperiodic EEG and 7T MRSI evidence for maturation of E/I balance supporting the development of working memory through adolescence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of structural brain asymmetries in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in 39 datasets 93%
- Using DNA to predict behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood 92%
- Brain Connectomics and Severity of Internalizing Symptoms in Early Adolescence Predict Severity of Suicidal Ideation in Later Adolescence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multimodal neural signature of face processing in autism within the fusiform gyrus 93%
- Stomach-brain coupling indexes a dimensional signature of mental health. 93%
- Prenatal cannabis exposure is associated with localized brain differences that partially mediate associations with increased adolescent psychopathology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain age prediction and deviations from normative trajectories in the neonatal connectome 94%
- Neonatal brain dynamic functional connectivity in term and preterm infants and its association with early childhood neurodevelopment 94%
- Polygenic architecture of brain structure and function, behaviors, and psychopathologies in children 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.