Back

Higher pre-treatment evoked alpha-band oscillatory brain dynamics predict chronic pain reduction of non-invasive brain stimulation of non-motor targets

De Martino, E.; Bach, M. M.; Couto, B. N.; Jakobsen, A.; Ingemann-Molden, S.; Casali, A.; Graven-Nielsen, T.; Ciampi de Andrade, D.

2026-01-02 pain medicine
10.64898/2025.12.31.25343260
Show abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of non-motor cortical targets, including the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and posterosuperior insula (PSI), has been proposed as a treatment for chronic pain with variable clinical outcomes. Pre-treatment local cortical dynamics were hypothesized to serve as markers of chronic pain reduction. In this secondary analysis of a large clinical trial comparing different rTMS targets for pain relief, it was examined whether pre-treatment evoked cortical responses measured by electroencephalography after TMS of DLPFC, ACC, or PSI were associated with at least 30 percent reduction in pain intensity scored on a visual analogue scale. Forty-five patients with chronic pain received 12 sessions over eight weeks of 10 Hz rTMS to DLPFC, ACC or PSI. Cortical reactivity was quantified using global and local mean field power, and oscillatory dynamics were assessed using event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and inter-trial coherence (ITC) in the alpha-band (8-12 Hz). Responders (20 of 45, 44%) compared with non-responders showed higher pre-treatment alpha-band ERSP and ITC over the stimulated cortical targets (both P<0.05), and higher alpha-band ERSP and ITC values were negatively correlated with the percentage change in pain intensity (both P < 0.05). These results suggest that elevated pre-treatment TMS-evoked alpha-band oscillatory activity may indicate a higher probability of pain reduction to non-motor rTMS in chronic pain. This supports the development of enrichment strategies using cortical neurophysiology-based markers in neuromodulation trials aimed at individualized, precision-oriented treatments.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
#1
351× avg
2
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
108× avg
3
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
121× avg
4
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 0.4%
32× avg
6
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 3%
8.3× avg
7
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 76%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 48%
3.1%
9
Cerebral Cortex
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
53× avg
10
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
11
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.6%
22× avg
12
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
13
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
9.4× avg
14
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 22%
1.3%
15
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 3%
7.6× avg
16
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 6%
4.0× avg