Back

Prospective Multicenter External Validation of the BIDIAP Index for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis

Arredondo Montero, J.; Herreras Martinez, A.; Rello Varas, L.; Escudero Villafane, A.; Iglesias Oricheta, M.; Larrea Ortiz-Quintana, M. d. M.; Fernandez Rodriguez, L.; Aguado Roncero, P.; Campos Calleja, M. C.; Diez, R.; Saez Alvarez, S.; Ruiz de la Cuesta Martin, C.; Delgado-Miguel, C.; Fernandez Atuan, R.

2026-01-02 pediatrics
10.64898/2025.12.31.25343255 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) remains challenging to diagnose despite existing diagnostic scores. The BIDIAP index is a three-item diagnostic tool with very high discriminative performance in a derivation cohort. This study aimed to prospectively and externally validate the BIDIAP index in a multicenter pediatric population. Material and MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study across four tertiary pediatric centers, enrolling children presenting with suspected PAA. Two groups were analyzed: patients with histopathologically confirmed PAA and patients in whom appendicitis was confidently excluded after diagnostic work-up, classified as non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP). The BIDIAP index was applied using a predefined cutoff ([≥] 4 points), and diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis, calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ResultsA total of 644 patients meeting the prespecified analytical criteria were included in the primary analysis. The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95). The calibration slope was 1.00, and the intercept was close to zero, indicating close agreement between predicted and observed risks. At the prespecified cutoff value of [≥] 4 points, the BIDIAP index achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 81.6%. DCA showed a positive net clinical benefit of the BIDIAP index over treat-all and treat-none strategies across the full range of clinically relevant threshold probabilities. ConclusionsThe BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for PAA. Its simplicity, based on only three items, and its potential applicability even when the appendix is not visualized on ultrasonography make the BIDIAP index a promising tool for supporting clinical decision-making in routine pediatric emergency practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.