Prospective Multicenter External Validation of the BIDIAP Index for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis
Arredondo Montero, J.; Herreras Martinez, A.; Rello Varas, L.; Escudero Villafane, A.; Iglesias Oricheta, M.; Larrea Ortiz-Quintana, M. d. M.; Fernandez Rodriguez, L.; Aguado Roncero, P.; Campos Calleja, M. C.; Diez, R.; Saez Alvarez, S.; Ruiz de la Cuesta Martin, C.; Delgado-Miguel, C.; Fernandez Atuan, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionPediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) remains challenging to diagnose despite existing diagnostic scores. The BIDIAP index is a three-item diagnostic tool with very high discriminative performance in a derivation cohort. This study aimed to prospectively and externally validate the BIDIAP index in a multicenter pediatric population. Material and MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study across four tertiary pediatric centers, enrolling children presenting with suspected PAA. Two groups were analyzed: patients with histopathologically confirmed PAA and patients in whom appendicitis was confidently excluded after diagnostic work-up, classified as non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP). The BIDIAP index was applied using a predefined cutoff ([≥] 4 points), and diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis, calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ResultsA total of 644 patients meeting the prespecified analytical criteria were included in the primary analysis. The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95). The calibration slope was 1.00, and the intercept was close to zero, indicating close agreement between predicted and observed risks. At the prespecified cutoff value of [≥] 4 points, the BIDIAP index achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 81.6%. DCA showed a positive net clinical benefit of the BIDIAP index over treat-all and treat-none strategies across the full range of clinically relevant threshold probabilities. ConclusionsThe BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for PAA. Its simplicity, based on only three items, and its potential applicability even when the appendix is not visualized on ultrasonography make the BIDIAP index a promising tool for supporting clinical decision-making in routine pediatric emergency practice.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 95%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 93%
- Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- External Validation of Predictive Models for Diagnosis, Management and Severity of Pediatric Appendicitis 95%
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 89%
- Characteristics and outcomes of cases of children and adolescents with pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome in a tertiary care center in Mexico City 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center 92%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 91%
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Clostridiodes difficile Infection 92%
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 89%
- Demographic disparities in clinical outcomes of COVID-19: data from a statewide cohort in South Carolina 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimising Early Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologics Era: Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis (ADMIT–ASC) 91%
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 90%
- Gastrointestinal symptoms as Covid-19 onset in hospitalized Italian patients 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.