Back

Clinical feasibility of spatial transcriptomics using discarded tissue from diagnostic breast biopsies

Sheridan, J. P.; Sun, Q.; Chen, J. G.; Wei, Y.; Jarzabek, V.; Jaishankar, A.; Amin, I.; Sultan, L.; Nalan, T.; Mueller, S. B.; Burks, E. J.; Suaiti, L.; Heaphy, C. M.; Ko, N. Y.; Dries, R.

2025-12-30 genomics
10.64898/2025.12.30.696765 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics holds potential to transform cancer diagnostics, yet significant barriers still limit its clinical translation. First, access to primary patient tissue is often restricted by logistical challenges and patient hesitancy. Second, it remains uncertain whether high-quality spatial transcriptomics data can be generated from clinical biopsy sections as these are collected primarily for diagnostic purposes that do not prioritize RNA-quality. We investigated whether discarded tissue slices, generated during standard pathology procedures, could be repurposed for spatial transcriptomics and alleviate concerns about both tissue availability and quality. Here, we established a pipeline to collect and perform spatial in situ transcriptomics on discarded biopsy material from a breast cancer patient, and digitized matched pathology images, including hematoxylin and eosin and traditional histochemistry stains from adjacent sections. Our results show that spatial transcriptomics data from discarded tissue are concordant with the original pathology report, while also providing additional insights such as accurate cell type annotation, detailed spatial architecture, and quantification of biological processes relevant to breast cancer progression. Altogether, our approach using discarded pathology tissue sections provides a practical and scalable solution that would maximize the scientific value of existing clinical specimens and enable high-resolution tumor microenvironment mapping.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.