Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Cheuyem, F. Z. L.; Tchamani, R.; Achangwa, C.; Nouko, A.; Davies, J.; Mfitumukiza, E.; Asahngwa, C. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundMpox, a zoonotic disease long endemic in Africa, has gained renewed global attention due to recent outbreaks. Effective control of the virus relies on public adherence to preventive measures, which is largely influenced by the populations knowledge and perception. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of good knowledge and positive perception toward mpox in Africa and to identify associated factors. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple relevant databases and grey literature sources. Studies conducted in African countries that assessed knowledge and/or perception of mpox were included. Pooled prevalences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore heterogeneity. ResultsThe analysis incorporated 38 studies with 23,648 participants from 15 African countries. The pooled prevalence of good mpox knowledge was 43.12% (95% CI: 34.38-52.32), indicating significant gaps in awareness. Knowledge levels varied substantially across subgroups. By participant type, teachers exhibited the highest knowledge (89.43%), followed by medical students (56.02%) and healthcare workers (51.39%), while the general population demonstrated markedly lower knowledge (14.88%). Geographically, Southern Africa had the highest knowledge prevalence (77.92%), whereas Central Africa had the lowest (19.20%). At the country level, South Africa (77.92%) and Kenya (68.31%) recorded the highest levels, while Libya (5.34%) and Somalia (9.68%) had the lowest. The pooled prevalence of a positive perception or attitude toward mpox was 54.22% (95% CI: 44.94-63.21). Pregnant women (81.43%) and healthcare workers (60.32%) reported the most positive perceptions, whereas community health workers showed the least (10.19%). Positive perception was highest in Northern Africa (63.02%) and lowest in Central Africa (7.27%). Individual levels of mpox knowledge and perception were significantly associated with several sociodemographic and non-sociodemographic factors. ConclusionsThis study reveals that overall knowledge of mpox across Africa is insufficient, and positive perception is only moderate, with considerable disparities across different populations and regions. The findings underscore an urgent need for targeted educational campaigns, enhanced training for healthcare workers, and context-specific communication strategies to boost awareness, improve attitudes, and strengthen continent-wide outbreak control and preparedness.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Have you heard of Rift Valley fever? Findings from a multi-country study in East and Central Africa 97%
- Armed Violent Conflict and Healthcare-Seeking Behavior for Maternal and Child Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review 97%
- Factors influencing uptake of COVID-19 diagnostics in Sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 96%
- Knowledge of COVID-19 Symptoms, Transmission, and Prevention: Evidence from Health and Demographic Surveillance in Southern Mozambique 96%
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox – a potential threat? A systematic review 96%
- Development and validation of a framework to improve neglected tropical diseases surveillance and response at the sub-national level in Kenya 96%
- Nudge strategies for behavior-based prevention and control of neglected tropical diseases: a scoping review and ethical assessment 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and living conditions in Bamako (Mali): a cross-sectional multistage household survey after the first epidemic wave, 2020 96%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.