Back

Age- and Sex-Adjusted Myocardial Flow Reserve Percentiles for Personalized Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Joseph, L.; Trinquart, L.; Lopez, D. M.; Soares Brandao, S.; Brown, J. M.; Divakaran, S.; Huck, D.; Weber, B. N.; Barrett, L.; Hainer, J.; Carre, S.; Lemley, M.; Ramirez Orozco, G.; Liang, J.; Blankstein, R.; Dorbala, S.; Alexanderson, E.; Carvajal-Juarez, I.; Acampa, W.; Packard, R.; Le, V.; Mason, S.; Knight, S.; Chareonthaitawee, P.; Wopperer, S.; Rosamond, T.; Buechel, R. R.; Einstein, A. J.; Al-Mallah, M. H.; Slipczuk, L.; Travin, M. I.; Berman, D.; Dey, D.; Slomka, P.; Di Carli, M. F.

2025-12-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343223 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPositron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a robust indicator of coronary vascular health and a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Clinical guidelines typically use fixed MFR thresholds (e.g., <2.0) to stratify risk, yet this approach overlooks individual variation, particularly by age and sex. We aimed to establish age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles and to evaluate their prognostic and predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment, in comparison with conventional fixed-threshold MFR approach. MethodsUsing data from the REFINE PET registry (24,820 patients from 12 sites), we measured PET MFR and derived age- and sex-adjusted MFR reference percentiles using quantile regression in patients without known coronary artery disease. All patients were categorized into percentile-based quartile groups. The primary outcome for prognostic and prediction analyses was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or heart-failure hospitalization. Time-to-event associations were evaluated using covariate-adjusted survival models, with cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HR) estimated at 1 and 5 years in the derivation dataset, an independent but similar validation dataset A, and a high-risk validation dataset B. Predictive performance for MACE was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and reclassification metrics, comparing percentile-based models with models using a fixed MFR threshold (<2.0). ResultsAmong participants (mean age 66.5 years; median follow-up 3.6 years), age- and sex-adjusted MFR quartile groups were strong independent predictors of MACE, with adjusted HR increasing stepwise across quartile groups at both early and later follow-up. At 1 year, HR (95% CI) comparing the lowest to the highest quartile group were 4.06 (3.41-4.82) in the derivation cohort, 3.31 (2.32-4.71) in validation cohort A, and 2.35 (2.05-2.70) in validation cohort B. At 5 years, the corresponding HR were 2.18 (1.86-2.56), 1.77 (1.31-2.40), and 1.59 (1.36-1.86). Percentile-based models demonstrated consistently higher discrimination, better calibration, and greater net reclassification for MACE at both time points compared with fixed-threshold MFR models. Although 67.2% of patients had preserved MFR (>2.0), cardiovascular risk increased steadily across MFR percentiles even within this range. ConclusionAge- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVEO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSO_LIIn a large, multinational real-world registry of more than 24,000 patients undergoing PET MPI, we derived age- and sex-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (MFR) percentiles, establishing a lifespan-based reference framework with age-specific reference values. C_LIO_LIAge- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles showed a strong, graded association with 1- and 5-year cardiovascular risk and demonstrated improved prognostic and predictive performance compared with fixed MFR thresholds and models without MFR across independent derivation and validation datasets, including a higher-risk cohort. C_LIO_LILower adjusted MFR percentiles were consistently associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart-failure hospitalization. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIAge- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a personalized, dynamic measure of coronary vascular health that improves cardiovascular risk stratification by accounting for age- and sex-related heterogeneity. C_LIO_LIA percentile-based approach may help clinicians better identify patients at elevated cardiovascular risk who may warrant closer monitoring or intensified preventive strategies, while avoiding unnecessary intervention in lower-risk individuals. C_LIO_LIBy integrating macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles offer a clinically interpretable marker of vascular aging that may inform future research on aging biomarkers, novel therapeutics and cardiovascular risk assessment across the spectrum of atherosclerotic and microvascular disease. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.