A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for Fedratinib
Wu, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundUsing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, this pharmacovigilance investigation systematically assessed the adverse events (AEs) associated with Fedratinib use in real-world clinical practice. MethodsUsing the FAERS database, we performed a disproportionality analysis incorporating four distinct signal detection methodologies: ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of age and gender on Fedratinib-associated AEs. Furthermore, a time-to-onset analysis was performed to characterize the temporal patterns of AEs. ResultsThe FAERS database comprised 10,011,422 individual case safety reports, of which 1,284 were classified as Fedratinib-related AEs, encompassing 38 significant preferred terms (PTs). The most frequently reported adverse reactions included diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal discomfort, fatigue, anaemia, platelet count decreased, and Wernickes encephalopathy. New AEs emerged from the study, such as blood potassium increased, hyperkalaemia, gout, hypocalcaemia, renal failure, renal disorder, and gallbladder disorder. Higher rates were observed in males over 65 years of age. Most cases occurred within the first month of Fedratinib treatment, with the incidence of related AEs decreasing over time. ConclusionThis current study marks the debut investigation regarding Fedratinibs safety in actual clinical practice, which providing substantive evidence to inform future pharmacovigilance investigations of this drug.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 94%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 93%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of biological agents 94%
- A Novel Computer-Assisted Drug-Induced Liver Injury Causality Assessment Tool (DILI-CAT) 94%
- A distinct four-value blood signature of pyrexia under combination therapy of malignant melanoma with BRAF/MEK-inhibitors evidenced by an algorithm-defined pyrexia score 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of XAV-19, a swine glyco-humanized polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, for COVID-19-related moderate pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study 92%
- Effect of Systemic Inflammatory Response to SARS-CoV-2 on Lopinavir and Hydroxychloroquine Plasma Concentrations 91%
- Efficacy and safety of interferon beta-1a in treatment of severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse Drug Reactions in Tuberculosis Treatment: Incidence, Reporting and Outcomes; Insights from a Mixed-Methods study across eight Indian cities 91%
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 89%
- QT prolongation risk factors and a monitoring strategy in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Findings from the STREAM Stage 2 trial. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.