Antidepressant drugs have pharmacological- and time-dependent effects on reinforcement learning in healthy volunteers: An 8 weeks randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study
Berkovitch, L.; VINCKIER, F.; Salvador, A.; Pessiglione, M.; Deakin, J. W.; Dawson, G. R.; Harmer, C. J.; Goodwin, G.; Gaillard, R.
Show abstract
Isolating specific cognitive effects of antidepressant drugs is crucial to develop targeted and individualized treatment selection in psychiatry. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy controls, we used computational modeling to characterize the cognitive effects of two classes of drugs for depression, escitalopram, a typical SSRI which increases serotonergic transmission, and agomelatine, which activates melatonin receptors and antagonizes 5-HT2C serotonergic receptors. 128 healthy participants were randomized to receive either escitalopram (20 mg), agomelatine (25 mg or 50 mg) or placebo for 8 weeks and performed two complementary learning tasks at three time-points allowing to measure early (3 days), intermediate (2 weeks) and delayed (8 weeks) treatment effects. The first task was a simple probabilistic instrumental learning task evaluating how participants learned from positive and negative feedback. The second task was a more complex reversal learning task devised to assess learning from positive and negative feedback in an unstable environment. At 8 weeks, both drugs improved accuracy in task 1 and decreased choice stochasticity in task 2 compared to placebo. Agomelatine 25 and 50 mg had an additional early beneficial effect on reward processing at 3 days whereas agomelatine 50 mg showed maximal effects at 2 weeks. Our study provides one of the very first cognitive evaluations of the delayed effects of antidepressant drugs in healthy volunteers. It reveals that they share common beneficial effect on learning along with pharmacological-specific effects. All observed effects varied highly over time, highlighting the non-linearity of the cognitive impact.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- L-DOPA modulates activity in the vmPFC, Nucleus Accumbens and VTA during threat extinction learning in humans 95%
- Therapeutic doses of ketamine acutely attenuate the aversive effect of losses during decision-making. 95%
- Dopamine enhances model-free credit assignment through boosting of retrospective model-based inference 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Angiotensin blockade enhances motivational reward learning via enhancing ventral striatal prediction error and frontostriatal communication 94%
- Directed exploration is elevated in affective disorders but reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction 92%
- 17β-estradiol status alters NMDAR function and antipsychotic-like activity in female rats 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts individual differences in exploration and exploitation during reinforcement learning 93%
- A Bayesian predictive approach for dealing with pseudoreplication 92%
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 93%
- Single-dose DMT reverses anhedonia and cognitive deficits via restoration of neurogenesis in a stress-induced depression model. 93%
- Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.