Back

Extensive recombination, selection, and asexual blooms shapethe diversity of the dominant clade of Prochlorococcus

Papula, A.; Birzu, G.; Fisher, D. S.

2025-12-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2025.12.29.696893 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tiny and enormously abundant marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus contains many levels of population structure, with sequenced isolates spanning four orders of magnitude of diversity. It is divided into several major clades which exhibit the classic structure of distinct species, with little gene exchange across clade boundaries. The diversity within the dominant clade, High Light II (HLII), exceeds that of many bacterial species but exhibits little global population structure beyond some small tight genomic clusters. Few ecological distinctions within HLII have been found. What causes and sustains for millions of years the extensive diversity of this globally mixed population? In this work, hundreds of single cell genomes are analyzed and used to elucidate patterns of core and flexible gene flow, delineate subtle geographical correlations, and quantitatively test several scenarios for the evolutionary history of HLII. We find that recombination connects the entire HLII clade and that genes more than a few kb apart along the genome evolve largely independently. On shorter timescales, primarily-asexual blooms occur, but the clonal backbones of the resulting closely-related cell clusters are steadily eroded by recombination with the rest of HLII. Although a small number of genes have ocean-specific alleles, there is no evidence for genetically-stable ecotypes within the clade. We conjecture that spatiotemporally variable selection drives conditionally-beneficial variants of genomic segments to rise to high abundance while horizontally-transferring throughout the population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.