Back

Genome-wide association studies identify genetic determinants of synucleinopathy biomarkers.

Somerville, E. N.; Liu, L.; Ta, M.; Iwaki, H.; Senkevich, K.; Alcalay, R. N.; Gan-Or, Z.

2025-12-30 neurology
10.64898/2025.12.29.25343142 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective-synucleinopathies are clinically and biologically heterogeneous disorders lacking reliable biomarkers to assist with early diagnosis, disease progression, patient stratification, and therapeutic targeting. Genetic variation is known to impact biomarker levels, influencing their utility and interpretation in research and clinical settings. We aimed to identify common genetic modulators of biomarker levels implicated in -synucleinopathy pathogenesis. MethodsGenome-wide association studies (GWASs) were conducted on 63 CSF, plasma, and urine biomarkers in 581 individuals from the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, disease status, and principal components. PD- and DLB-risk loci associations were separately assessed for each GWAS. ResultsWe confirm strong associations between urine bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate (BMP) isoforms and the variants LRRK2 p.G2019S and GBA1 p.N370S, while providing support for BMPs use as a LRRK2-PD biomarker. CSF A{beta} was significantly associated with an APOE {varepsilon}4 allele, reinforcing its central role in amyloid regulation. Novel associations were detected between CSF ceramide isoforms the MCF2L2 and GMNN loci, and between CSF tau and the TP63 locus. Multiple PD risk loci, including MAPT, SIPA1L2, MCCC1, and RAB29, were associated with lysosomal lipid biomarkers, highlighting pathway-level convergence. InterpretationThe present study reveals established and novel genetic modulators of potential -synucleinopathy biomarkers, demonstrating that genetic background significantly shapes biomarker levels. These genetic influences should be accounted for when conducting biomarker-based research, clinical trials, or therapeutic development to ensure accurate interpretation and improve their translational relevance.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.