Back

Activator-promoter compatibility in mammals: a CpG-Island-specific co-activator directly bridges transcription factors to TFIID

Nemcko, F.; Sabath, K.; Pagani, M.; Kleinfercher, S.; Plaschka, C.; Stark, A.

2025-12-29 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.28.696747 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription from CpG island (CGI) promoters controls the expression of two-thirds of mammalian genes, yet despite their prevalence, it remains unknown whether CGI-specific co-activators with intrinsic specificity (i.e. compatibility) for these promoters exist or by what mechanisms they might function. Here, we perform proteome-wide functional screens to identify more than fifty transcriptional activators that are intrinsically specific to CGI promoters, establishing that promoter-class-specific activators are a widespread feature of mammalian gene regulation. Among these, we identify Host Cell Factor 1 (Hcfc1) as the founding member of CGI-specific co-activators. Hcfc1 is essential for the expression of thousands of CGI-promoter-driven genes and acquires CGI-specificity through a two-step mechanism: CGI-associated transcription factors recruit Hcfc1 through its Kelch domain, and Hcfc1 in turn directly engages the general transcription factor TFIID through a dedicated activation domain. The Hcfc1-TFIID interaction overcomes a key rate-limiting step for CGI promoter initiation, TFIID recruitment, thereby directly enabling transcription. Hcfc1 thus functions as a promoter-class-specific bridge between CGI-bound transcription factors and the general transcription machinery, analogous to Mediator but with intrinsic promoter specificity. Together, we uncover a dedicated activation pathway for CGI promoters, reveal a fundamental mechanistic difference in transcription activation between promoter classes in mammals, and establish co-activator-promoter compatibility as a core principle in mammalian gene regulation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.