Back

Object speed and distractor number do not affect attentional allocation in multiple object tracking

Adamian, N.; Akalan, F.; Andersen, S. K.

2025-12-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.28.696734 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Keeping track of multiple moving objects across dynamic real-world scenarios such as driving, team sports, or crowded social environments is a fundamental challenge for visual attention. We have previously demonstrated that as the number of tracked objects increases, the strength of attentional facilitation allocated to each individual object decreases, limiting tracking success. It is also well established that beyond the number of tracked objects, faster-moving objects and objects embedded amongst higher numbers of distractors are more difficult to track. Are these effects on tracking difficulty also mediated by less effective allocation of attention to tracked targets as in the case of tracking more targets? If so, one should expect the strength of attentional modulation to drop systematically with increasing speed and total number of moving stimuli. In two experiments (total n = 70), participants were instructed to track moving targets amongst identical distractors while we manipulated object speed (Experiment 1) and number (Experiment 2). As expected, tracking performance declined with both manipulations. However, steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) recorded during successful tracking revealed that attentional enhancement of tracked targets compared with distractors did not drop with increasing speed or object number. In summary, bottom-up changes in the stimulus display and top-down attentional manipulations affect tracking performance in independent ways, with the balance between strength of attentional allocation and bottom-up demands of the task determining successful tracking. The allocation of attention itself seems to be determined exclusively by top-down goals rather than being reactive to bottom-up display characteristics. Open Practices StatementParticipant level data and analysis code for all experiments are available at (https://osf.io/ypgfs/) and Experiment 1 was preregistered (https://osf.io/pxh25/). Significance statementKeeping track of multiple moving objects is fundamental to navigating dynamic real-world scenarios. This ability is accomplished through multifocal attentional selection, which weakens as the number of tracked targets increases. This study asks whether other stimulus manipulations increase tracking difficulty by diluting attentional allocation. Using steady-state visual evoked potentials to measure selective attention during tracking, we demonstrate that both increases in speed and distractor number impair performance, however, they do not affect attentional enhancement of targets. This suggests that top-down attentional control operates independently from bottom-up demands.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
10
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%