Accuracy And Generalizability of an Open-Source Deep Learning Model For Facial Bone Segmentation on CT and CBCT Scans
Gkantidis, N.; Ghamri, M.; DOT, G.
Show abstract
AimTo evaluate the accuracy and generalizability of DentalSegmentator, an open-source deep learning tool, for automated segmentation of skeletal facial surfaces from computed tomography (CT) scans acquired under different imaging conditions. Materials and MethodsTen human skulls were scanned using a CT scanner and three cone beam CT (CBCT) protocols (including an ultra-low-dose protocol) on two CBCT devices. High-accuracy reference surface models were acquired using an optical scanner. CBCT an CT scans were segmented automatically using DentalSegmentator. Three facial regions (forehead, zygomatic process, maxillary process) were defined on each model for quantitative assessment. Accuracy was measured as the mean absolute distance (MAD) and the standard deviation of absolute distances (SDAD) between segmented and reference models after best-fit superimposition. ResultsRepeated segmentations were identical, confirming perfect reproducibility. Across all acquisition settings and regions, DentalSegmentator produced highly accurate skeletal surface models, with an overall MAD of 0.088 mm (IQR 0.073) and SDAD of 0.061 mm (IQR 0.028). Significant but small differences were detected between imaging systems (MAD: p < 0.001; SDAD: p = 0.003), with CT scans showing slightly reduced trueness compared with CBCT images. ConclusionThe open-source DentalSegmentator tool produced accurate skeletal facial surface segmentations across diverse CT and CBCT settings, demonstrating excellent generalizability, including under low-radiation conditions. Minor differences in trueness between imaging systems were small and unlikely to impact clinical or research use. Clinical SignificanceDeep learning offers a robust foundation for automated 3D craniofacial surface extraction, supporting broader adoption of AI-driven workflows in both clinical and research contexts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 97%
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 91%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible 92%
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 92%
- Evaluation of longitudinal time-lapsed in vivo micro-CT for monitoring fracture healing in mouse femur defect models 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elastomeric Harnesses Decrease Aerosol Particles Leak and Improve the Fit of Surgical Masks 87%
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 86%
- Deep Learning To Predict Degree Of Interstitial Fibrosis And Tubular Atrophy From Kidney Ultrasound Images - An Artificial Intelligence Approach 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.