Phenotypic Plasticity and Competition Shape Therapy Sequencing in HER2+/HER2 Breast Cancer: A Mathematical Framework
Gavrilova, A.; Jackson, T. L.; Rahman, N.
Show abstract
Tumour heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity are major drivers of treatment failure in cancer, enabling rapid adaptation under therapeutic pressure. In HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, tumours often contain both HER2+ and HER2-negative (HER2-) cells whose interactions complicate schedule design. We develop a compact ordinary differential equation framework for intratumoral HER2+/- dynamics that integrates phenotypic plasticity with density-dependent growth and inter-phenotype competition. Phenotype-specific therapies are incorporated through simple pharmacodynamic surrogates: Paclitaxel chemotherapy acting primarily on HER2+ cells and Notch-pathway in-hibition targeting HER2- cells. We use the model to compare staggered and simultaneous treatment schedules. The results show that treatment order and relative intensity critically shape long-term tumour composition. Targeted-first schedules can exhibit competitive release, whereby subsequent aggressive chemotherapy unintentionally favours HER2- expansion. In contrast, simultaneous initiation suppresses both phenotypes more effectively and avoids strong rebound. These findings highlight the importance of ecological structure in therapy design and support simultaneous combination therapy followed by targeted maintenance.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A model for the intrinsic limit of cancer therapy: duality of treatment-induced cell death and treatment-induced stemness 98%
- Evolution of phenotypic plasticity leads to tumor heterogeneity with implications for therapy 97%
- Intra-tumor heterogeneity, turnover rate and karyotype space shape susceptibility to missegregation-induced extinction 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.