Back

Coupled dynamics of predator group formation and prey populations

Borofsky, T. M.; Akcay, E.; Rubenstein, D.; Greenbaum, G.; Levin, S.

2025-12-26 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.26.696504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1A diverse array of social carnivores, such as orcas and wolves, also hunt cooperatively, but it is not well understood how prey availability feeds back with the size of social carnivore groups. Cooperative hunting may expand predators access to food by allowing them to hunt prey they could not catch alone, but many predator groups are much larger than the group size that would maximize individual food intake. One promising explanation is that if individuals can freely leave and join groups, then predators behaving adaptively should continue to join a group until the fitness that they achieve in the group is the same as that of being solitary. Here, we investigate the stable group sizes that form in a population of predator groups when predators hunt two types of prey: big prey that is best hunted in groups and small prey that is best hunted alone. In conjunction, we track the dynamics of the distribution of predator group sizes when individuals make decisions about whether to join or leave groups based on their own fitness. We find that if individual predators are able to freely leave groups and pair up with other individuals, starting new groups, then group sizes at equilibrium are much smaller than expected, generally staying at or below the size that maximizes individual fitness. Furthermore, accounting for flexible group sizes leads to ecological conditions that are not predicted if predator group sizes are held constant; in some regions of the parameter space, predators partition resources by forming a bimodal distribution of group sizes, and as a result, create situations where an increase in one prey type helps the other prey population grow. This result has applications to management of carnivore-livestock conflict, implying that increasing populations of wild prey may protect livestock.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
18
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
21
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
23
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
27
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%