Did you see the sound? A Bayesian Perspective on Crossmodal Perception in Low Vision
Chan, A. Y. C.; Stiles, N. R. B.; Levitan, C. A.; Tanguay, A. R.; Shimojo, S.
Show abstract
Multisensory integration is often assumed to increase when visual input is degraded, yet it re-mains unclear whether low vision enhances susceptibility to cross-modal illusions or whether such effects depend on local variations in visual reliability. We tested low vision and sighted control participants on the Double Flash Illusion across 24 visual-field locations while sepa-rately measuring flash-detection accuracy. Both groups showed the expected auditory-driven increase in perceived flash numerosity, but only sighted controls reliably experienced the clas-sic "double-flash" percept. Illusion strength did not vary with eccentricity; instead, it was strongly predicted by local flash detection accuracy, indicating that sound-induced percepts depend on the availability of a reliable visual signal. Bayesian Causal Inference modeling revealed substantially weaker and more variable fits for low vision observers, with poorer fits associated with reduced visual sensitivity. Although model parameters did not differ significantly between groups, the similarity in estimated visual noise likely reflects model limitations rather than true equivalence in sensory precision. Together, these findings show that low vision does not globally amplify audiovisual interactions; rather, auditory enhance-ment depends on local visual reliability, and degraded vision leads to weaker alignment with Bayesian-optimal predictions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissociable Pupil and Oculomotor Markers of Attention Allocation and Distractor Suppression during listening 95%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 95%
- Awareness-dependent normalization framework of visual bottom-up attention 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal-inference regulates audiovisual spatial recalibration via its influence on audiovisual perception 95%
- Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias that favors prior-congruent evidence 94%
- Modality Independent or Modality Specific? Common Computations Underlie Confidence Judgements in Visual and Auditory Decisions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mixture model investigation of the inner-outer asymmetry in visual crowding reveals a heavier weight towards the visual periphery 94%
- Perceptual decisions are biased toward relevant prior choices 94%
- Learning to see the Ebbinghaus illusion in the periphery reveals a top-down stabilization of size perception across the visual field 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.