Back

Laser-driven VHEE pulsed fast fractionation (PFF): second-scale inter-pulse timing differentially modulates normal tissue and tumour toxicity

Giaccaglia, C.; Bayart, E.; Varma, C.; Goddet, J.-P.; Gautier, J.; Tafzi, A.; Manant, E.; Lamarre-Jouenne, I.; Heinrich, S.; Fouillade, C.; Flacco, A.

2025-12-26 cell biology
10.64898/2025.12.24.696225 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) is constrained by the narrow therapeutic window between tumour control and normal-tissue toxicity. While FLASH RT has been reported to reduce normal-tissue toxicity at ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) with preserved tumour control in several preclinical models, the radiobiological potential of temporal regimes intermediate between conventional fractionation and FLASH remains largely unexplored. Here, we use a laser-plasma accelerator (LPA) to access this regime by delivering sub-picosecond very high-energy electron (VHEE, 50-300 MeV) pulses at ultra-high instantaneous dose rates (UHIDR; > 109 Gy s-1) with externally programmable inter-pulse intervals. We introduce Pulsed Fast Fractionation (PFF): ultrashort (fs-ps) pulses delivered under UHIDR conditions with second-scale inter-pulse intervals and implementation-dependent dose per pulse. In this work, we vary the inter-pulse interval from 1 to 10 s while keeping dose per pulse and total dose constant, and identify an interval of 1 s that enhances normal-tumour separation: human fibroblasts exhibit reduced toxicity, whereas colorectal carcinoma cells show increased cytotoxicity under matched dose conditions. In vivo, zebrafish embryos reproduce the interval-dependent normal-tissue protection, supporting relevance in a whole-organism context. These results establish second-scale pulse timing as a biologically active degree of freedom for VHEE delivery, positioning PFF as a temporally optimised approach that complements spatial dose modulation and extends the current fractionation-FLASH framework.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.