Exploring Prevalence and Drivers of Perimenopause Uncertainty Among U.S. Women: A Mixed-Methods Study
Xu, Y.; Fergus, D.; Hewings-Martin, Y.; Prentice, C.; Cunningham, A. C.; Hedges, M.; Shufelt, C.; Faubion, S.; Zhaunova, L.
Show abstract
ObjectivePerimenopause is an under-recognized life stage that may be accompanied by complex and fluctuating symptoms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of perimenopause uncertainty and explore the underlying drivers. MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study based on a cross-sectional survey of U.S. women aged 35 years and above (N=7,640). Closed-ended responses were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of perimenopause uncertainty with subgroup differences investigated by age and symptom severity. Content analysis of free-text responses (n=409) was conducted to identify the main uncertainty drivers. ResultsOverall, 34% of participants reported being unsure of their reproductive stage. Uncertainty peaked among those aged 40-44 (42%) and was highest among those with severe symptom burden (37%). The content analysis revealed three main uncertainty drivers. Symptom confusion and attribution was the most common (56%), reflecting difficulties interpreting bodily changes and distinguishing perimenopause from other causes. Knowledge gaps and information seeking accounted for 28% of responses, highlighting limited health literacy, assumptions about age, and active searches for evidence. Barriers to confirmation and care (16%) described dismissive healthcare encounters and reluctance to acknowledge perimenopause. Younger women (35-39 years) were more likely to cite knowledge gaps, while healthcare barriers peaked in the 40-44 age group. ConclusionPerimenopause uncertainty is a prevalent and clinically meaningful challenge. This uncertainty is conceptually distinct from illness-focused models: it is a universal transition with ambiguity and often lack of validation. Better symptom recognition and targeted communication is a crucial first step toward improving womens awareness and support during perimenopause.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 95%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 94%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 92%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 92%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin levels early in perimenopause inform vasomotor symptom incidence across the menopausal transition 93%
- Sitagliptin decreases visceral fat and blood glucose in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome 90%
- Characterizing the Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Electronic Health Records 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of >145,000 Symptom Logs Reveals Distinct Pre, Peri, and Post Menopausal Phenotypes 95%
- Chronicling menstrual cycle patterns across the reproductive lifespan with real world data 94%
- Total testosterone is not associated with lean mass or handgrip strength in pre-menopausal females: findings from the NHANES 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.