Transcriptome profiling to identify blood biomarkers for peritoneal endometriosis
Pusic Novak, M.; Vizintin, A.; Rezen, T.; Ban Frangez, H.; Wenzl, R.; Lanisnik Rizner, T.
Show abstract
ContextPeritoneal endometriosis (PE) remains challenging to diagnose, as it cannot be detected using standard imaging modalities and no clinically validated biomarkers are available. ObjectiveTo identify novel blood-based biomarkers for PE using whole blood transcriptomics combined with machine learning approaches. Design, Setting, and PatientsThis observational study enrolled 48 women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis-related symptoms at tertiary referral centres in Slovenia and Austria. Patients were classified as having PE (n=20), peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis (PE and OE, n=8), or no endometriosis (controls, n=20). Patients were further stratified by menstrual phase (proliferative or secretory). Whole blood samples were collected preoperatively. MethodsWhole-blood RNA sequencing was performed, and differentially expressed genes (DGEs) and transcripts (DTEs) were identified. Sequencing data were processed using a machine learning pipeline to select key features and develop support vector machine (SVM) classifiers for predicting endometriosis status. ResultsIn the proliferative group, no DGEs and only two DTEs distinguished PE from controls. In contrast, in the secretory group, 1,035 DGEs and 922 DTEs were identified, with no overlap between menstrual phases. Enrichment analysis of secretory phase DGEs indicated their involvement in angiogenesis and immune-related pathways. Feature selection identified six transcripts that achieved the best SVM classification performance in distinguishing cases from controls across both menstrual phases (AUC = 0.92, sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 100%). ConclusionThis study provides first evidence that integrating whole-blood transcriptomics with machine learning can identify potential blood-based biomarkers for PE and highlights the influence of menstrual cycle phase. These findings require validation in larger, independent cohort.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omics analyses and machine learning prediction of oviductal responses in the presence of gametes and embryos 94%
- Single cell RNA sequencing and lineage tracing confirm mesenchyme to epithelial transformation (MET) contributes to repair of the endometrium at menstruation 94%
- N-cadherin mechanosensing in ovarian follicles controls oocyte maturation and ovulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Immunophenotyping Reveals Endometriosis is Marked by Dysregulation of the Mononuclear Phagocytic System in Endometrium and Peripheral Blood 98%
- Single cell analysis of menstrual endometrial tissues defines phenotypes associated with endometriosis 96%
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Uterine secretome initiates growth of gynecologic tissues in ectopic locations. 94%
- Transcriptomic Signatures of WNT-Driven Pathways and Granulosa Cell-Oocyte Interactions during Primordial Follicle Activation 93%
- Evaluation of the efficacy of Lactobacillus -containing feminine hygiene products on vaginal microbiome and genitourinary symptoms in pre- and postmenopausal women: A pilot randomized controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.