Back

Stomatal setpoints and environmental responsiveness are sculpted by developmental trajectories

Rath, M.; Sharma, N.; Mani, M.; Bergmann, D.

2026-05-05 plant biology
10.64898/2025.12.22.696041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efficient gas and water exchange between plants and their environment largely depends on the number and distribution of stomata, cellular valves in leaf epidermis. Core genetic regulators of stomatal cell identity and pattern along with asymmetric stem-cell like divisions in stomatal precursors are hypothesized to customize stomatal production for optimal leaf performance. How these regulators work in concert and how division dynamics are modified and adjusted in different environments, however, are poorly understood. Here, we leveraged the variation in stomatal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana accessions from diverse environments to define developmental rules and constraints in the stomatal lineage. The accessions subtle and quantitative variation enables us to identify which cellular parameters are flexible, revealing how developmental plasticity generates phenotypic plasticity. By developing live-cell imaging tools to track cellular behaviors during leaf growth under varying environmental conditions in these accessions, we could decompose stomatal density variation into its developmental origins. Variation in final stomatal numbers is driven by differences in the relative contributions of stomatal initiation, cell size-based fate thresholds, general proliferative capacity, and coordination between sister and neighbor cell behaviors. Overall, diverse accessions converge toward two lineage regimes: one dominated by autonomous decisions with loose cell-cell coordination, the other by extensive cell-cell coordination. Challenging accessions with environmental fluctuations revealed regime-specific flexibility, with plasticity primarily mediated by a single division-related parameter. Our results show how cellular parameters integrate into alternative developmental strategies that shape environmental responsiveness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
16.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
3
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.1%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
10
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.5%
12
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.9%
14
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
17
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%