Analytical Performance of the AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel
Geller, L.; Fiore, A.; Perez, L.; Minzer, C.; Liu, Y.; Alvarado, E.; Casarez, N.; Martinez, B.; Nako, J.; Rodriguez, G.; Arroyo, Y.; Johnsen, N.; Ross, C.; Foltz, F.; Martin, R.; Peytavi, R.; Srinivasan, A.
Show abstract
Influenza A, Influenza B, SARS-CoV-2, Respiratory Syncytial Virus and other respiratory pathogens are an ongoing public health concern. The ability to rapidly identify these viruses early in infection is essential for effective treatment and outbreak control. The AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel (MRP) incorporates sample preparation and real-time RT-PCR for detection of Flu A, Flu B, SARS-CoV-2 and RSV from anterior nasal swab (ANS) specimens in less than 10 minutes at the point of care. We established the analytical performance characteristics of the Fast PCR MRP and determined that the limit of detection (LoD) is 250 copies/mL for Flu A and RSV, and 500 copies/mL for Flu B and SARS-CoV-2. In a reproducibility study at 3 clinical sites, there was at least 98.2% positivity for each target for a weak positive (2x LoD) sample, at least 99.6% positivity for a moderate positive (5x LoD) sample and the negative sample returned a negative result for at least 99.3% of the tests. Fast PCR MRP had 100% analytical reactivity to all strains tested (23 Flu A, 6 Flu B, 8 SARS-CoV-2 and 6 RSV) and at least 98% predicted inclusivity from in silico analysis. There was no cross-reactivity to 40 viruses, bacteria and fungi, nor interference for 15 endogenous and exogenous substances in ANS matrix. The Fast PCR MRP delivers excellent analytical performance comparable to high complexity laboratory assays, at the point of care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 98%
- Analytical comparison of over-the-counter multiplex tests for influenza A, influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Real-time RT-PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay for Detection of N501Y Mutation in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Variants of Concern 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 96%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 95%
- Performance of the TaqMan™ COVID-19 Pooling Kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic populations at an Institution of Higher Education 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Verification of the Abbott Alinity m Resp-4-Plex Assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus 97%
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 96%
- Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at elevated temperatures 95%
- Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.