Back

Disentangling Brain-Psychopathology Associations: A Systematic Evaluation of Transdiagnostic Latent Factor Models

Gell, M.; Hoffmann, M. S.; Moore, T. M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Gur, R. C.; Salum, G. A.; Milham, M. P.; Langner, R.; Mueller, V. I.; Eickhoff, S. B.; Satterthwaite, T. D.; Tervo-Clemmens, B.

2026-02-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.21.695029 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the neurobiological basis of mental health disorders and their symptoms is a central goal of research in psychiatry. Yet, identifying robust brain-psychopathology associations with neuroimaging remains difficult, in part due to substantial heterogeneity within and comorbidity between diagnostic categories. Transdiagnostic latent factor models aim to address this structure by separating shared and unique symptom variance. This can potentially yield more reliable and neurobiologically-relevant dimensions of psychopathology. However, the extent to which latent factor models improve brain-psychopathology associations remains largely unclear. Using two large developmental cohorts, we compared transdiagnostic bifactor models, correlated factor models, and typical summary scores derived from the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) in their reliability and multivariate associations with whole-brain structure (MRI) and function (resting-state fMRI). We found no consistent evidence that latent factors (bifactor or correlated factor models) strengthened reliability or brain-psychopathology associations, relative to summary scores. Whole-brain predictive models revealed broadly distributed neural signatures that were highly similar between corresponding factor and summary score constructs, with general psychopathology factors and total problem summary scores approaching numerical equivalence. Bifactor scores did, however, display more distinct neural signatures between general, internalising, and externalising dimensions than did summary or correlated factor scores. These results suggest that phenotypic modelling of psychopathology alone does not systematically strengthen the predictive utility of psychiatric neuroimaging, possibly reflecting fundamental limits on the amount of explainable symptom variance by brain features. While latent factor models may aid in distinguishing neural correlates between constructs, improving phenotypic assessment may be necessary for improvements to brain-psychopathology association strength.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.4%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
19
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%