Back

Gamification Enhances User Engagement and Task Performance in Prosthetic Vision Testing

Turkstra, L. M.; Johnson, B. A.; Kartha, A.; Dagnelie, G.; Beyeler, M.

2025-12-22 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2025.12.20.25342740 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeVisual function testing in retinal prosthesis users relies on repetitive psychophysical tasks that are cognitively demanding and fatiguing. Gamification may increase engagement, but its effects on perceptual performance in implanted users remain unclear. MethodsThree Argus II users completed circle localization and motion direction discrimination in clinical and gamified versions. Visual stimuli, trial structure, and response requirements were matched within each participant; gamified versions added scoring, background music, and affectively framed end-of-trial auditory feedback. Difficulty and response format were calibrated to individual abilities (8AFC for two participants; 4AFC restricted to cardinal directions for one participant). ResultsGamification improved accuracy and reduced angular error in localization but did not improve motion discrimination. Effects were task-dependent and varied across participants, with reduced precision in the gamified motion task for one user. Participants preferred gamified localization and reported higher enjoyment and sustained attention; responses to gamified motion were mixed. ConclusionsGamification can influence measured performance and user experience in prosthetic vision testing, but benefits are not universal and depend on task demands and cognitive load, indicating that engagement can affect outcomes in tests often treated as objective. Translational relevancePersonalized, engagement-aware gamified tools with adaptive difficulty may improve the usability and scalability of prosthetic vision assessment and rehabilitation, including at-home training.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
4
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
15
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%