Back

Intersectional Socioeconomic Inequalities in Maternal and Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Cambodian Women: A Secondary Analysis of the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey

YEM, S.; Sokunthea, K.; sreyroth, N.; Moniroth, M.; Sreypeov, T.

2025-12-22 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.20.25342731 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHealth inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often reflect compounding social disadvantages. Intersectionality theory emphasizes that multiple axes of disadvantage can interact to shape health experiences in ways not captured by single-factor analyses (Crenshaw, 1989, 1991). Understanding how poverty and low education combine to affect maternal and reproductive health is essential for advancing universal health coverage and "leaving no one behind" under the Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2015; World Health Organization, 2023). This study examined intersectional socioeconomic inequalities in maternal and reproductive health outcomes among Cambodian women. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of women aged 15-49 years interviewed in the Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey (CDHS) 2021-22, a nationally representative household survey implemented by the National Institute of Statistics (NIS) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, with technical assistance from ICF (National Institute of Statistics et al., 2022). Women were classified into six intersectional socioeconomic status (SES) groups by cross-classifying household wealth (poor/middle/rich) and education (no/primary vs. secondary+). Outcomes included antenatal care (ANC) [≥]4 visits, facility delivery, skilled birth attendance, modern contraception use, unmet need for family planning, and teenage childbearing. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), accounting for the complex survey design (National Institute of Statistics et al., 2022). ResultsAmong 6,968 women with recent births, 82% attended [≥]4 ANC visits and 96% delivered in facilities, but only 20% had skilled birth attendance. Compared with women with both high wealth and secondary+ education (reference), women with poor wealth and no/primary education had substantially lower odds of [≥]4 ANC visits (aOR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.23, 0.48]), facility delivery (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), and skilled birth attendance (aOR = 0.20, 95% CI [0.14, 0.27]). For reproductive health, poor/low-education women had higher odds of modern contraception use (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.06, 1.43]) and no difference in unmet need (aOR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.85, 1.16]). Teenage childbearing showed strong educational gradients (35% in poor/low-education vs. 16% in rich/high-education). ConclusionsIntersectional socioeconomic disadvantage creates compounding barriers to quality maternal healthcare in Cambodia. Despite near-universal facility delivery, skilled attendance--defined in global monitoring as births attended by trained health personnel such as doctors, nurses, or midwives--remains highly unequal and concentrated among advantaged groups (United Nations Statistics Division, 2023). Policies should prioritize equitable quality of delivery care, target multiply disadvantaged women, strengthen rural health workforce distribution, and invest in girls secondary education as a long-term maternal health strategy (National Institute of Statistics et al., 2015; World Health Organization, 2023).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
13.9%
2
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.1%
4
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
21
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%