Back

Primary cilia in the growing limb are preferentially orientated,uncoupled from centriolar position

Johnson, T.; Miotla-Zarebska, J.; Midha, S.; Vincent, T. L.; Wann, A. K.; Jule, A. M.; Randall, G.; Apolinova, K.; Sansom, S. N.

2026-06-02 cell biology
10.64898/2025.12.19.695513 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How cells and their organelles are positioned in three-dimensional, organ level, anatomical context, is rarely investigated. Here we focus on cells, centrioles and primary cilia in the growing limb. Through the ciliums mechanobiological role in skeletal development, we explored the mechanobiology of morphogenesis. A transgenic mouse model (Centrin 2-GFP.ARL13B-mCherry), combined with an image analysis pipeline, can map cellular size, positions and orientations, centriole position and ciliary axoneme orientation, all with respect to the anatomy of the epiphysis or growth plate. The line was crossed with an ift88fl/flCreERT2 line to enable ciliary ift88 deletion. We used limb immobilization, to test for a role of mechanical forces associated with ambulatory loading, in the organization of these elements and transcriptomics to understand the role of forces in regulating growth plate morphogenic programs. The pipeline can accurately quantify expected patterns of cell orientation and size through zones of the growth plate. Analysis across thousands of cells, through regions and zones of multiple murine growth plates, reveals cilia prevalence is increased in the periphery, highest in the resting zone in the outer limb, harboring stem cells. Cilia length is greatest in the hypertrophic cells about to die or transdifferentiate, as part of the formation of bone from cartilage by endochondral ossification. The inducible and cartilage-specific, deletion of ciliary gene ift88, alters cell orientation and sizes and reduces ciliation in the areas where endochondral ossification is most disrupted, the periphery and expanded hypertrophic zones, linking changes in structure to function. Most strikingly, centriole position, including that of the basal body, from which the ciliary axoneme is extended, is not preferentially organised. In contrast, cilia axoneme orientation is preferentially organised. Axonemes are directed posterior or anterior, 45 degrees to the axis of the limb, irrespective of their position, which is defined by basal body position. Immobilization of the limb for 2 weeks markedly alters the transcriptomic profile of the growth plate, with changes to size and orientation of cells and alterations in matrix and cytoskeletal profiles. Within altered genes, primary cilia genes themselves are regulated, including those indicative of altered cilia signaling such as hedgehog signaling. However, despite the role of cilia in mechanobiology of the growing limb, and ciliary signature within changes to loading of the limb, cilia orientation is unaltered by the removal of ambulatory associated forces. Patterns of ciliation in control and IFT88cKO mice help reconcile the previously observed anisotropic effects of cilia perturbation, focusing study on stem cell-resting chondrocytes and hypertrophy, when considering the mechanobiological role of cilia in limb development. Endochondral ossification is apparently highly sensitive to ambulatory loading at transcriptomic level, including effects on ciliary genes and signaling. A highly organized orientation of these putative antennae is governed by centriole position-independent mechanisms and is independent to changes to ambulatory loading, indicating a cell intrinsic mechanism. The resilient position of axonemes in the limb, points to mechano-regulatory mechanisms for how cilia integrate biophysical signals. We propose that predominant ventral or dorsal orientation at 45 degrees to horizonal plane but never parallel to cranial-chordal or medial-lateral axis, ensures multiple signal integration and avoids single signal blindness.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.8%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
6
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
7
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
9
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
10
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
14
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
Matrix Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
18
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
19
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
20
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
21
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Cytoskeleton
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
96 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
29
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%