The impact of an ambient documentation tool on the care experience of clinical pharmacists embedded in ambulatory clinics: A mixed methods evaluation
Olson, A. W.; Pradhan, A.; Whary, P.; Dombrowski, S. K.; Dobbins, D.; Ward, T. M.; Obert, K. M.; Siegrist, C. N.; Wright, E. A.
Show abstract
PurposeAmbient Documentation Tools (ADT) are an emerging technology designed to help clinicians complete documentation better with less time and effort. This study aimed to understand the impact of ADT on the pharmacist care experience. MethodsData from Epic Signal, surveys, and interviews were collected between February 2024 and October 2025 from 41 medication therapy disease management (MTDM) pharmacists across 33 primary care and subspecialty clinics at a large integrated health system who were given ADT licenses. Study variables included pharmacist ADT utilization rate and pre-/post-changes in time spent in notes per encounter, as well as perceptions of documentation burden, patient access, undivided attention for patients, afterhours documentation, and burnout. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression models, and comparative tests of pre-/post-statistical significance and effect size. Qualitative data were mined for exemplary excerpts to deepen understanding. ResultsThirty pharmacists from 28 clinics utilized ADT and provided usable responses. ADT was utilized for 65% of eligible encounters, and the average time in notes per encounter fell 86 seconds post-ADT. Pharmacist perceptions of documentation burden, undivided attention ability, and afterhours documentation improved post-ADT. Interview responses were largely positive for most variables and revealed multiple explanatory mechanisms. ConclusionADT meaningfully improved several care experience aspects for MTDM pharmacists over a short period of time (2-7 months). Future research with larger samples and longer time horizons across multiple health systems is needed to investigate the full and sustained impact of ADT on the care experience. Key pointsO_LIThis mixed-methods study is the first to investigate the impact of an ambient documentation tool (ADT) on the care experience of clinical pharmacists embedded in ambulatory clinics. C_LIO_LIData from Epic Signal, surveys, and interviews were triangulated to assess ADT usage and evaluate pre-/post-ADT deployment changes in pharmacist care activities and perceptions. C_LIO_LIPharmacists activated ADT for 65% of eligible encounters, reducing time spent in notes by 86 seconds per encounter and improving their perceptions of documentation burden, ability to give patients undivided attention, and afterhours documentation. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 93%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 92%
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 95%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
- How, Why And Under What Circumstances Does A Quality Improvement Collaborative Build Knowledge And Skills In Clinicians Working With People With Dementia? A Realist Informed Process Evaluation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 93%
- Active vaccine safety surveillance via a scalable, integrated system in Australian pharmacies 93%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 93%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.