Back

IHGAMP: Pan-cancer HRD prediction from routine H&E whole-slide images using foundation models

Ahmad Zafar, S.; Qin, W.; Chengliang, L.; Khan, A. A.; Nazir, A.; Batool, H.; Khalid, F.; Faisal, M. S.

2025-12-20 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.19.25342650
Show abstract

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) confers sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy, representing a critical biomarker for precision oncology across multiple malignancies. Current HRD assessment relies on next-generation sequencing of genomic scar signatures, but specialized infrastructure requirements, high costs, and prolonged turnaround times limit widespread adoption. These barriers restrict access to HRD testing, particularly in resource-constrained settings where the majority of cancer patients receive care. Pan-cancer HRD prediction has been shown, but robustness across histologies and institutions, leak-safe evaluation, and backbone-dependent generalization remain incompletely characterized. Here we show that IHGAMP (Integrative Histopathology-Genomic Analysis for Molecular Phenotyping), a computational framework using vision transformer foundation models, predicts HRD status from H&E images with an AUROC of 0.766 (95% CI 0.727-0.803) on the TCGA held-out test set using OpenCLIP embeddings, and improves to 0.827 with histopathology-pretrained OpenSlideFM embeddings under the same leak-safe protocol. External evaluation on 927 patients (2,718 whole slide images) from seven independent cohorts demonstrated generalization in adenocarcinoma/serous settings (e.g., CPTAC-LUAD AUROC 0.723) and enabled platinum resistance prediction in PTRC-HGSOC (AUROC 0.673), with attenuation in squamous histologies. Systematic comparison of foundation-model embeddings showed that OpenSlideFM outperformed OpenCLIP internally on TCGA (0.827 vs 0.766 AUROC) and improved external generalization in select cohorts (e.g., CPTAC-LUAD), while performance remained attenuated in squamous histologies; TSS-level embedding norm stability across 710 tissue source sites suggested limited site-driven magnitude shifts. Our findings establish that routine histopathology contains morphology associated with HRD that enables moderate, histology-dependent prediction, supporting a potential screening/triage role to prioritize confirmatory molecular testing where appropriate.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 0.4%
22.4%
2
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 3%
5.9%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.8%
5.3%
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 36%
5.0%
7
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
3.1%
9
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 10%
2.6%
10
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 90%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 9%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 6%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
22
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 16%
0.9%
23
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
29
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 13%
0.7%
30
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%