Back

Monte Carlo Wavelet Analysis for Objective PeakDetection in SRM LC-MS/MS Analysis

Julian, R. K.; Rappold, B. A.; Yi, F.; Master, S. R.

2026-05-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2025.12.18.694988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Detection of low-level analytes in complex chromatographic-mass spectrometric data requires a criterion to discern apparent peaks from background. Conventional signal-to-noise criteria rely on simple, constant-variance noise models and overlook spurious peaks generated by chemical noise and co-eluting interferences. We introduce a wavelet-based Monte Carlo technique for determining the statistical significance of SRM LC-MS/MS peaks in the presence of structured chemical noise. The method empirically characterizes chemical-noise peaks in samples and builds a generative noise-only null model. Monte Carlo resampling of the noise model assigns p-values that are controlled for the family-wise type I error rate (FWER). We validated the method with SRMs from a dilution series of drug compounds in plasma with known ground-truth concentrations. Triplicate technical replicates were used, spanning concentrations from far above the limit of detection to far below it. Peaks with adjusted p < 0.05 matched the expectation for true positives above the detection limit. Peaks below the limit of detection matched matrix blanks as true negatives, and intermittent detection in the transition region was observed. An independent external validation using a clinical pain panel confirmed the method detects ketamine in confirmed positive samples with signal intensity below the lowest calibration standard while correctly classifying matrix blanks and biological negatives. As a demonstration, we applied our method to a recently published lipid mediator data set. By replacing subjective noise-region selection with a formal hypothesis test against an empirical null model, the method provides an objective and reproducible criterion for deciding whether peak integration is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.6%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
5
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
6
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
7
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%