Slower reactive stepping kinematics are associated with lower clinical balance function and delayed cortical evoked responses under challenging balance conditions after stroke
Tsai, S.-Y.; Payne, A. M.; Mirdamadi, J. L.; Ting, L. H.; Borich, M. R.; Palmer, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe ability to elicit a rapid, reactive step to recover balance after a postural destabilization is paramount to fall prevention. In response to a given balance perturbation magnitude, people after stroke display impaired spatiotemporal stepping kinematics. Yet, spatiotemporal stepping kinematics at individualized perturbation magnitudes after stroke and the underlying neural correlates remain unknown. Here, we tested whether stepping kinematics differ in people after stroke at individualized balance perturbation magnitudes and further examined neuromechanical mechanisms underlying impaired stepping kinematics after stroke. Methods16 participants with chronic (>6mo.) stroke and 16 age-matched controls underwent standing balance perturbations at individualized step threshold, the perturbation magnitude that elicited unintentional steps in approximately 50% of trials. We quantified the spatiotemporal kinematics of the first reactive step and weight-bearing asymmetry immediately prior to the perturbation onset. Cortical N1s, perturbation-evoked brain responses reflecting cortical processing for balance control, were extracted from Cz signals and identified as the most negative local minimum (100-300ms). ResultsWhile there were no group-level differences in step duration, step velocity, and step trajectory, people with stroke showed delayed step initiation (Cohens d= 0.89, p=0.02) and termination latencies (Cohens d= 0.81, p=0.03). Delayed step initiation latencies after stroke correlated with lower clinical balance function (e.g., miniBEST score; r= -0.67, p=0.004) and delayed cortical responses (r=0.58, p=0.02) but not weight-bearing asymmetry (p>0.86). ConclusionsThe relationships between delayed step initiation, lower clinical balance function, and slower cortical responses suggests cortical processing speed may be a limiting factor for post-stroke balance function and identifies neuromechanical targets for fall prevention.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Concurrent validity and discriminative ability of force plate measures of balance during the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery 97%
- Clinical measures of balance and gait cannot differentiate somatosensory impairments in people with lower-limb amputation 96%
- The relationship between gait asymmetry and stability in people with sub-acute stroke 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-site identification and generalization of clusters of walking impairment in individuals with chronic stroke and neurotypical controls 96%
- Impairments in proprioceptively-referenced limb and eye movements in chronic stroke 95%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of targeted assistance and perturbations on the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in people with chronic stroke 97%
- Identification of distinct subtypes of post-stroke and neurotypical gait behaviors using neural network analysis of kinematic time series data 95%
- Application of a novel force-field to manipulate the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in human walking 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impairments in the mechanical effectiveness of reactive balance control strategies during walking in people post-stroke 97%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 95%
- Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Muscle Synergies During Complex Locomotor Task in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy: A TMS and EMG Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.