The Effect of COVID-19 Hospitalisation on the Occurrence of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sadiq, K.; Pazoki, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe relationship between COVID-19 hospitalisation and stroke occurrence remains incompletely understood, with reported incidence rates varying significantly across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between COVID-19 hospitalisation and stroke occurrence, while examining key subgroup variations and potential risk factors. MethodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from December 2019 to 2023. Studies reporting stroke occurrence in hospitalised COVID-19 patients were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsNineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary meta-analysis of 17 studies, comprising 98,297 patients, revealed a pooled stroke occurrence of 1% (95% CI: 1%,2%). A comparative analysis of three studies showed no significant difference in stroke risk between hospitalised COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 hospitalised controls (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.49,2.65). However, within the COVID-19 hospitalised population, stroke risk was strongly associated with disease severity, including the need for mechanical ventilation (OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 2.21,5.83) and ICU admission (OR: 6.33, 95% CI: 4.95, 8.09). Significant pre-existing comorbidities included hypertension (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.12,4.92) and atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.18,3.31). Ischemic stroke was the predominant subtype, accounting for 81% of cases (95% CI: 73%,90%). Quality assessment of the 19 studies identified 9 as high quality and 10 as moderate quality. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that while the overall occurrence of stroke in hospitalised COVID-19 patients is approximately 1%, the risk is not significantly elevated compared to non-COVID-19 hospitalised patients. Instead, stroke occurrence is powerfully driven by the severity of the illness and the presence of traditional vascular risk factors. These findings underscore the critical need for vigilant neurological monitoring and targeted stroke prevention strategies, particularly for COVID-19 patients who require intensive care or mechanical ventilation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 96%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk, clinical course and outcome of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study 96%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 96%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
- Smoking does not alter treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke; a Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 95%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.