Back

Musical training improves planning and robustness of sequence learning

Leow, L.-A.; Lum, J. A.; Johnson, S.; Corti, E.; Marinovic, W.

2026-01-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.17.695034 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Musicians demonstrate advantages in acquiring motor sequences, showing faster learning and better explicit sequence knowledge than non-musicians. However, it is unclear whether this advantage extends beyond acquisition to the consolidation phase, which is when newly learned skills stabilize and become resistant to interference. Additionally, while interference from executing competing motor tasks is well-established, less is known about whether purely sensory information presented after learning can disrupt consolidation of a bimodal motor sequence. We investigated how post-acquisition sensory interference affects performance of a learned audio-visual sequence, and whether musical training moderates this vulnerability. Participants first learned an explicit sequence in a serial reaction time task using synchronous, informative audio-visual cues. After a brief consolidation period, they were randomly assigned to one of four observational conditions that manipulated the relationship between auditory and visual streams. Motor performance was then reassessed. Post-acquisition sensory interference impaired subsequent motor performance, but this effect was modality-specific: it was driven primarily by manipulations to the task-relevant visual stream, while auditory interference alone had no credible effect. Distributional analysis revealed that learning involved a strategic shift from reactive to anticipatory responding. Critically, participants with musical training showed an earlier and consistently higher reliance on anticipatory responses than those without, demonstrating a more rapid adoption of predictive motor control. These findings demonstrate that newly formed sensorimotor memories are selectively vulnerable to interference in task-relevant modalities. Furthermore, our work provides a candidate mechanistic account for the musician advantage in sequence learning, linking it to faster development of predictive motor strategies during consolidation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.0%
13
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
16
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
18
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
20
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
24
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%