Back

A global synthesis of yeast in microbiomes

Lin, C.-P.; Geroldi, A.; Selem, N.; Liti, G.; Tsai, I. J.

2025-12-18 microbiology
10.64898/2025.12.17.695015 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Yeasts are widespread members of microbial communities across terrestrial, aquatic, and host-associated environments, yet they remain underrepresented in microbiome studies due to low abundance and methodological biases. By combining a literature review with a meta-analysis of [~]44,000 fungal metabarcoding samples from the GlobalFungi database, we show that yeasts occur in over 90% of samples, confirming their global ubiquity. Basidiomycetous lineages--especially Agaricomycotina--were most frequently detected, whereas Saccharomycotina were more restricted to anthropogenic and aquatic settings. Although yeasts typically comprised only [~]0.1% of fungal reads, their distributions were non-random and reflected distinct habitat preferences across environments. In [~]3% of samples, yeasts exceeded 25% of reads, with genera such as Aureobasidium, Hanseniaspora, and Saccharomyces episodically dominating nutrient-rich or human-influenced environments. Cosmopolitan genera including Vishniacozyma, Solicoccozyma, and Rhodotorula were broadly distributed but remain underreported in microbiome surveys. Shotgun metagenomic data further confirmed yeast presence across diverse microbiomes, though with consistently low coverage, reflecting the "curse of low abundance." Despite their rarity, yeasts likely play disproportionate roles in nutrient cycling, plant growth, and host interactions. We recommend inclusive multi-kingdom approaches--improved primers, long-read sequencing, and quantitative tools--to better integrate yeasts in microbiomes.

Published in Yeast (predicted rank #28) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.