Back

Aspartate Transaminases Are Dispensable for Pancreatic Development and Pancreatic Cancer Progression

Ugras, J.; Nelson, N.; Kerk, S. A.; Sutton, D.; Lin, L.; Sajjakulnukit, P.; Dombrowski, T.; Davidson, G.; Lavoie, B.; Awad, D. A.; Olivei, A.; Yan, W.; Strayhorn, C.; Radyk, M.; Perricone, M.; Pasca di Magliano, M.; Bednar, F.; Frankel, T.; Shah, Y. M.; Lyssiotis, C. A.

2025-12-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.12.17.694916 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. This is due in part to the limited availability of effective treatment options for patients, highlighting a significant need for new targets and approaches. Deregulated metabolism is a hallmark feature of PDA that has gained attention as a promising inroad for therapy. The aspartate transaminases (glutamate oxaloacetate transaminases, cytosolic GOT1 and mitochondrial GOT2) have several important metabolic functions, including maintaining energy and redox balance and generating aspartate, an essential building block in protein and nucleotide biosynthesis. Previous studies of GOT proteins in preclinical tumor transplant models have yielded conflicting results regarding the requirement of GOT1 and GOT2 for PDA tumor growth. To assess the role of GOT proteins in tumor development and tumor maintenance, we generated conditional knockout mice for Got1 and Got2 and crossed these into pancreas-specific models. Whereas loss of either Got does not impact pancreas development, double Got1 and Got2 knockout results in markedly reduced pancreas size and cellularity without overtly impacting endocrine or exocrine function. In genetically engineered cancer models, single Got loss does not impact lesion formation, tumor size, animal survival, or the composition of the tumor microenvironment. Identical results were also observed in orthotopic allograft mouse models. Together, these findings add to a growing body of work illustrating the adaptability of metabolism in cancer. They also emphasize the importance of model selection, the use of multiple independent models, and the in vivo context when studying the role of metabolic programs in cancer.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
3
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.6%
7
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
14
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
16
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
24
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
26
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%