Back

Airway organoids reveal patterns of Influenza A tropism and adaptation in wildlife species

Tarres-Freixas, F.; Ceada, G.; Catala-Moll, F.; Casadella, M.; Tolosa-Alarcon, S.; Franco-Trepat, E.; Boreika, R.; Almagro-Delgado, V.; Carmona, N.; Estruch, J.; Fernandez-Bellon, H.; Fuentes-Moyano, L.; Molina-Lopez, R.; Navarro, N.; Parera, M.; Perez-Simo, M.; Repulles, J.; Roca, N.; Torne, O.; Velarde, R.; Valencia, A.; Paredes, R.; Izquierdo-Useros, N.; Romero-Durana, M.; Kochanowski, K.; Vergara-Alert, J.

2025-12-17 microbiology
10.64898/2025.12.17.694819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying animal species that are susceptible to the plethora of existing and emerging viruses is critical for predicting and containing disease outbreaks. Current efforts to assess viral tropism largely rely on experimental infection models, but such experiments are logistically and ethically infeasible for many wildlife species. To tackle this challenge, we developed a panel of airway organoids from ten taxonomically diverse wildlife and livestock species and evaluated their susceptibility to influenza viruses of mammalian (pH1N1) and avian (H5N1) origin. Our analyses revealed large species-specific differences in infection rate and cytopathogenicity that aligned with known in vivo data and field observations. Furthermore, we demonstrated that this organoid panel can serve as a powerful tool to elucidate receptor-binding mechanisms, viral dynamics, and early host adaptation in poorly characterized animal species. In summary, this work provides a robust and ethically viable approach for evaluating viral tropism and adaptation in wildlife species, and fills a critical gap in current pandemic preparedness, zoonotic disease surveillance, and wildlife conservation efforts.

Published in Emerging Microbes & Infections (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.