Back

Modeling assembly dynamics and stability of microbial communities

Eilersen, A.; Sneppen, K.; Bonhoeffer, S.

2025-12-19 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.17.694811 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting the species composition of microbial communities is a problem that has proven surprisingly difficult, including in fully controlled microbial systems in a lab setting. Few organisms are able to establish themselves in an community with no others, even if nutrients are provided. At the same time some species are observed to be unable to stably coexist with certain other species. We here present a model attempting to reduce the dynamics of community assembly to its most basic components, while preserving its salient features. The model deals not with abundances or densities of bacterial populations or resources, but only with their presence or absence. Similarly, only three types of discrete relationships between species are considered: species excluding each other, and mutualistic dependence on and production of nutrients in the form of exometabolites. Despite these simplifications, the model system still exhibits rich dynamics, including extinction cascades and emerging stability against invasion. We derive conditions for these to occur and compare our results with existing knowledge of microbial communities. Our results provide a novel approach for the theoretical study of microbial communities and their stability. SignificanceUnderstanding the processes governing the community composition of microbial ecosystems is an as-yet unsolved problem. In this article, we propose a novel rule-based model for the assembly and stability of communities of microbial species. Despite its simplicity the model exhibits rich dynamics, including critical points and extinction cascades. It presupposes no knowledge of specific population parameters or exact resource or species abundances, but focuses on pairwise interactions between species and their metabolites. The framework may be useful for understanding how real microbial communities arise and what causes them to break down.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.6%
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
15
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
18
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%