Noise in Competing Representations Determines the Direction of Memory Biases
Chetverikov, A.; Hansmann-Roth, S.
Show abstract
Memories are reconstructions, prone to errors. Historically considered a nuisance, memory errors have recently gained attention when found to be systematically shifted away from or toward non-reported items, promising insights into memory mechanisms. We propose that these biases are optimal and inevitable when the brain disentangles overlapping memory signals, predicting that bias direction depends on the noise distribution between memorized items, not just absolute noise levels. We tested this prediction in four color-memory experiments using novel stimuli with independently varied noise levels. The results support our hypothesis: targets with the same absolute noise level can be repelled from or attracted to non-target items, depending on their relative noise levels. We further show that the model can fit nonlinear bias patterns observed in human data with noise levels as the only free parameters. These findings challenge currently dominant models and support signal disentanglement as a unifying explanation of memory biases.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception 98%
- Cherry-picking information: humans actively sample evidence to support prior beliefs 96%
- Strategy-dependent effects of working-memory limitations on human perceptual decision-making 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.