Back

Environment-dependent evolution drives divergent adaptive strategies and parasite dynamics in a minimal community

Lungu, T. S.; Badruna, L.; Rendueles, O.

2025-12-17 microbiology
10.64898/2025.12.17.694638 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prophages, phage genomes integrated into bacterial chromosomes, are widespread, yet, the extent to which these resident parasites contribute to host fitness and shape evolutionary trajectories, particularly in polymicrobial environments, remains unclear. Here, we use an experimental evolution approach in which a polylysogenic bacterial strain carrying phages on both its chromosome and plasmids evolves under environmental conditions that modulate the costs and benefits of prophage carriage. By tracking bacterial growth and phage production over time, we uncover divergent, environment-dependent adaptive strategies among lysogens. Some populations evolve dramatically increased phage production, with titers rising over 1,000-fold, whereas in environments where phages impose strong fitness costs, prophages are either purged or domesticated. Across all evolved populations, adaptation is accompanied by defects in cellular segmentation arising from mutations in the divisome and Tat translocation pathways. Whole-genome sequencing revealed shifts in lysate composition, suggesting altered interactions among co-occurring prophages, alongside the loss of plasmid- encoded prophage antibiotic resistance genes and reduced resistance to two distinct antibiotic classes. Together, our results demonstrate that prophages are dynamic evolutionary players whose interactions with host genomes and ecological context jointly shape bacterial adaptation, in complex communities, with implications for exploiting phage-antibiotic trade-offs in therapeutic design.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.