Back

Primate-specific adaptation of Ku protects transcriptomic integrity by suppressing Alu-mediated alternative splicing

Yu, T.; Yoon, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, A.; Lee, B. J.; Moakley, D. F.; Duan, J.; Deng, Q.; Hou, F.; Yan, M.; Gennarino, V. A.; Zhang, K.; Chen, L.; Zha, S.; Zhang, C.

2025-12-18 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.17.694518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate pre-mRNA splicing is essential for the transfer of genetic information but faces unique challenge in higher primates due to the massive expansion of intronic Alu elements1-3. While studying Ku, the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer best known for initiating non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) by encircling DNA ends4, we discovered that Ku expression increased markedly during primate evolution in parallel with Alu expansion5. Ku binds double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) stem-loops, including those at the antisense Alu (asAlu) elements within introns5. Here, we show that Ku-depletion in human cells has a broad impact on splicing largely independent of cell-cycle states, NHEJ, or innate immune signaling, significantly affecting ~8-10% of quantifiable alternative splicing events. Mechanistically, Ku directly binds exonic asAlu to prevent their aberrant inclusion and binds asAlu within inverted-repeat Alu (irAlu) pairs flanking canonical exons to prevent exon skipping6. Among human tissues, Ku expression in the brain is consistently ~50% lower, correlating with more permissive expression of Alu-derived splice variants, particularly those encoding mitochondrial proteins and RNA-binding factors. Correspondingly, heterozygous Ku loss in patient causes developmental delay, neurological dysfunction, and acidosis. Together our findings identified Ku as a critical suppressor of Alu-associated alternative splicing co-opted during evolution with implications for primate brain function and human disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.