Patient needs and expectations regarding cognitive impairments in long COVID: perspectives of young and older adults in the UK
UK Long COVID Cognitive Experience Research Group, ; Shan, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo explore how younger and older adults in the UK experience, manage, and seek treatment for long COVID-related cognitive impairments, and to identify their treatment preferences and expectations. DesignQualitative study using Charmazs (2014) constructivist grounded theory methodology. SettingOnline, semi-structured interviews conducted with UK adults reporting long COVID-related cognitive symptoms, recruited via patient support groups and research panels. ParticipantsTwenty-one adults with long COVID cognitive impairments: 10 younger participants aged 25-38 years and 11 older participants aged 60-72 years. Main outcome measuresPatients lived experiences, coping strategies, healthcare interactions, and treatment preferences and expectations for non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, analysed through iterative coding, constant comparison, and theory generation. ResultsIn the absence of effective treatments, both age groups relied heavily on self-management strategies (e.g., memory aids, structured routines, pacing). Interactions with healthcare were characterised by validation from some clinicians but widespread frustration at the lack of treatment options. Younger adults were more proactive in seeking experimental therapies and clinical trials, while older adults emphasised pragmatic adaptation, independence, and cautious optimism. Across groups, participants preferred non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., cognitive rehabilitation) but also expressed hope for biomedical treatments. The central process identified was "striving for agency" in the face of ongoing cognitive difficulties. ConclusionsThis study highlights the urgent unmet need for evidence-based interventions to address long COVID-related cognitive impairment. Health services should provide practical cognitive rehabilitation and support, and clinicians should acknowledge and validate patients cognitive struggles rather than dismissing them as normal ageing or purely psychogenic in origin. Research into therapeutics (e.g. cognitive training programs, pharmacotherapies) is urgently desired by the participants in this study. Effective solutions will need to be holistic and individualised - addressing not only memory and concentration deficits but also the psychological and social challenges associated with long COVID cognitive impairment in different age groups. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICO_LIA large proportion of people with long COVID experience persistent cognitive difficulties, often described as "brain fog," with substantial impact on daily functioning and employment. C_LIO_LIMost studies have focused on symptom prevalence, biological mechanisms, or broad psychosocial consequences. C_LIO_LILittle is known about patients treatment preferences and expectations, and almost no research has explored generational differences between younger and older adults. C_LI WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSO_LITo our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study in the UK to compare younger and older adults perspectives on managing long COVID-related cognitive impairment. C_LIO_LIBoth groups described "striving for agency" through self-management, validation-seeking in healthcare, and balancing preferences for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. C_LIO_LIYounger adults were more proactive in seeking experimental therapies and trial participation, while older adults emphasised pragmatic adaptation and maintaining independence. C_LI HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE, OR POLICYO_LIHealthcare services should expand access to cognitive rehabilitation and psychosocial support, while clinicians should validate patients experiences rather than attributing them to ageing or stress. C_LIO_LIFuture research must test both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, with study designs informed by patient priorities and generational needs. C_LIO_LIPolicymakers and service providers should tailor care pathways to life stage: supporting younger adults with workplace accommodations and research opportunities, while providing older adults with reassurance, independence-focused care, and monitoring for possible accelerated cognitive ageing. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 96%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 95%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Online46: online cognitive assessments in elderly cohorts - the British 1946 birth cohort case study 93%
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 92%
- Persistence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Dementia Prognostication: A Comparison of Three Operational Definitions of Mild Behavioral Impairment 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 94%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 94%
- Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “It makes you realise your own mortality.” A qualitative study on mental health of older adults in the UK during COVID-19 96%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 96%
- Caregivers’ burden of care during emergency department care transitions among older adults: a mixed methods cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 92%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 91%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.