Back

Epidemiology and Clinical Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis in People with HIV

Timonina, V. N.; Popadin, K.; Ait Oumelloul, M.; Calmy, A.; Cavassini, M.; Capoferri, G.; Gunthard, H. F.; Walti, L. N.; Schmid, P.; Tarr, P. E.; Thorball, C. W.; Bick, A. G.; Fellay, J.; Swiss HIV Cohort Study,

2025-12-19 epidemiology
10.64898/2025.12.17.25342413 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), defined by the expansion of hematopoietic cells with somatic mutations in leukemogenic genes (CH of indeterminate potential (CHIP)) or with mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), is associated with aging and adverse health outcomes in the general population. CHIP prevalence has been shown to be higher in People with HIV (PWH) than in controls. However, the full spectrum, prevalence, and clinical consequences of CH in PWH remain incompletely understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of CHIP and mCAs in a large sample of PWH (N[~]2,500) from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Using high-depth targeted sequencing of CHIP genes and genome-wide genotyping to call mCAs, we quantified the prevalence and clone size of both types of CH. CHIP (found in 25% of individuals) and mCAs (found in 16% of individuals) were found to be common, positively correlated with age, often co-occurring (OR=1.7, p=0.02 for autosomal mCAs), and associated with various clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality (HR=1.3, p=0.02 for CHIP) and hematologic malignancies (HR=9.4, p=0.01 for the effect of CHIP on the risk of myeloid cancer; HR>10, p<0.001 for the effect of co-occurring CHIP and mCAs on the risk of lymphoid cancer). We also observed associations of CH with several proxies of inflammatory status (CD4:CD8 ratio, HIV viral load, late initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and toxicity of antiretroviral drugs), highlighting a potential interaction between CH and chronic immune activation.

Published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.