The Dominance of Geometric Graph Models in Animal Social Networks
Appaw, R. C.; Silk, M. J.; Rushmore, J.; VanderWaal, K. C.; Charleston, M.; Fountain-Jones, N. M.
Show abstract
O_LIDetecting patterns in animal social behaviour and movement is complicated by the diversity of ecological, evolutionary, environmental, and biological drivers of these behaviours such as migration, foraging, assortative mixing, socio-ecological factors, and human influence. C_LIO_LIAddressing these complexities requires a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advances in network analysis and machine learning offer powerful tools for examining and interpreting complex network structures, aiding in the identification and quantification of movement patterns and the prediction of behavioural changes. C_LIO_LIHere we use a comparative approach leveraging network analysis and machine learning techniques to assess commonalities in standard theoretical social structures governing networks across the animal kingdom. We investigate how these theoretical structures explain social organization at different scales, from entire populations to smaller groups. By leveraging interpretable machine learning techniques, we examine the predictive power of species and network construction techniques in predicting structural features of animal social networks. C_LIO_LIWe found that geometric graphs are the frequently predicted network model across the animal kingdom. These graphs represent both spatial and social processes and are formed by positioning individuals uniformly on a 2D plane, with links established based on proximity within a specified distance. In particular, geometric graphs demonstrate structural similarities with interaction types and data collection methods. For example, we found that this graph model had strong structural similarities with networks derived from physical contact and spatial proximity data. Networks with small-world properties, in contrast, were rare across all interaction types and collection methods. Additionally, the occurrence of these networks is influenced by the identity of species and sampling duration. Although incorporating species identity into the classification model did not improve the accuracy of the prediction, it enabled us to account for the varying dependencies of biological characteristics on specific behaviours. C_LIO_LIThis study highlights the value of predictive modelling for uncovering ecological drivers of animal network structures. By focusing on standard theoretical models that are well established in network science, we connect animal social networks to broader theoretical findings, while recognizing that more tailored models combining multiple generative models or network properties may offer deeper insights into network structures. We also emphasize the importance of considering how the specific methods used to build networks for each taxon could influence the biological inferences that can be drawn from those networks. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common datastream permutations of animal social network data are not appropriate for hypothesis testing using regression models 96%
- (De)composing sociality: disentangling individual-specific from dyad-specific propensities to interact 96%
- Robust Bayesian analysis of animal networks subject to biases in sampling intensity and censoring 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A user-friendly guide to using distance measures to compare time series in ecology. 92%
- Inferring species interactions from ecological survey data: a mechanistic approach to predict quantitative food webs of seed-feeding by carabid beetles 92%
- Population genetics meets ecology: a guide to individual-based simulations in continuous landscapes 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.