Prevalence, distribution, and mechanisms of genetic dominance in the yeast mating pathway
Allen, M. G.; Martinez, A. A.; Lang, G. I.
Show abstract
The proportion of mutations that are dominant is a fundamental genetic parameter affecting the rate of adaptation, the efficacy of selection, and the maintenance of variation in populations. Yet, estimates for this parameter vary greatly. Here we directly quantify the rates and genetic targets of dominant and recessive mutations in the yeast mating pathway by performing parallel genetic screens in haploid (MATa) and diploid (MATa/a) yeast. We find that [~]1% of alpha-factor resistant mutations are dominant. We sequenced 95 alpha-factor resistant mutants to determine the genetic architecture of dominant and recessive mutations. We find recessive mutations throughout the mating pathway; however, dominant mutations are concentrated in three genes: STE4, GPA1, and CLN3. Finally, we investigate the mechanism of genetic dominance in each of these genes. This work sheds light on the prevalence and molecular basis of genetic dominance in a model eukaryotic signal transduction pathway.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive synthetic genetic array analysis of alleles that interact with mutation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RecQ helicases Hrq1 and Sgs1 96%
- Chemical-genetic interactions with the proline analog L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 95%
- Multiple changes underlie allelic divergence of CUP2 between Saccharomyces species. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Directed evolution for cell separation in natural isolates of budding yeast reveals selection to deactivate AMN1 and the Rim101 pathway in haploids and selection in favor of Hawthorne's deletion in diploids 97%
- A screen for synthetic genetic interactions with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hrq1ΔN allele 95%
- Genetic suppression interactions are highly conserved across genetic backgrounds 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.