Back

Versatile high-speed volumetric imaging from microscopic to macroscopic scale by self-adaptive oblique plane microscopy

Meyer, D.; Kroeschell, G.; Lu, X.; Hoang, L.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Xu, Y. K. T.; Tan, L.; Mumm, J. S.; Bergles, D. E.; Yi, J.

2025-12-18 bioengineering
10.64898/2025.12.16.694458 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is an increasing need for large-scale high-speed volumetric recording in complex multi-cellular model systems to define dynamic processes. Oblique plane microscopy (OPM) provides a solution that features oblique illumination, rapid optical scanning, and remote focusing to achieve real-time 4D microscopy. OPM implements light sheet imaging via a single primary objective lens, making the entire space below the objective accessible for large specimens, such as living mouse brain. Yet it is challenging to adopt OPM beyond a microscopic scale (i.e. size < 1mm), limiting its broad applications. Here we present a self-adaptive OPM that leverages Abbes sine condition to unlock its flexibility across a range of field-of-views (FOVs) (up to 8 mm2) and resolutions (down to 2.2 {micro}m3). This versatility enables brain-wide single neuron volumetric calcium imaging in behaving larval zebrafish (1x0.4 mm2 FOV at 5 Hz) and capillary blood cell tracking in living mouse brain (>3x3 mm2 FOV) with a sweeping 0.32 mm wide volume section at 100 Hz. In optically cleared mouse brain, the flexibility allows a screen-and-zoom capability by sequentially imaging the whole brain at low-and-high magnifications to locate and resolve subcellular structures such as dendritic tress and spines. By offering a switchable imaging resolution, volume, and speed, the self-adaptive OPM achieves a versatile platform for studying a wide range of multi-cellular model system, whether in vivo or fixed and optically cleared.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.